Replies

And lastly for those few who aren't willing to believe the court's characterization of the Dover plaintiffs' expert witness testimony, we just have to get it from the horse's mouth:

Behe Cross-X Day 12 http://www.aclupa.org/downloads/Day12AM.pdf
p22 line 25 Q. "And in fact there are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred, is that correct?"
A. [Plaintiff's expert witness, Prof. Behe]: "That is correct, yes."

[emphasis added to aid the few who are still too addled to understand that one of ID's greatest promoters just admitted under oath that ID advocates haven't produced a single article in peer-reviewed journal supporting their claims that any biological system was intelligently design.]

Yup, it sure looks like it's ID, and not Darwin's theory, which is head for the dump.