An can the debate of "scientific socialism", "technocracy" etc be limited to those who accept the pre-suppositions of those disciplines?
And can the debate over morality and good vs evil be limited to clergemen and those with theological degrees?
This last question illustrates exactly what is not scientific about the modern scientific community. The modern scientific community has is hierarchy of bishops, priests and seminarians. Any seminarian who disagrees with the "exclusive role" of the clergy is not a legitimate seminarian and will not be allowed to become a priest in the church of modern science.
This is true, not just of the topic of evolution, but also of many other politically correct topics from global warming to funding of the National Institutes of Health. The priesthood rules.
Well said, well said indeed.
Yes...those high steeples of the ivory white tower...so they may look down upon the great unwashed.
The modern scientific community has is hierarchy of bishops, priests and seminarians.
That's such a ridiculous statement I just wanted to repeat it.
This is an example of an anti-science rant.