Replies

The Clintons were all about "equalizing all nations", their equalizer was nuclear. Now the Clinton coalition was global under their umbrella of the UN, and these oil nations witnessed what the supposed civilized nations were willing to do with Saddam's oil.

So it is very easy to point a finger at these terrorists nations, but I got to tell you they were not exactly put on notice under Clintonism. We were forced after 9/11 to put them on notice and even still after 9/11 the Clinton coalition are like their PR advance teams.

Now what kind of image did the clintons set for UAE of US when old bill was acting as their non registered foreign agent promoting this deal, and then out of nowhere comes his woman, accusing President Bush of selling port security to a terrorist nation?

"Now what kind of image did the clintons set for UAE of US when old bill was acting as their non registered foreign agent promoting this deal, and then out of nowhere comes his woman, accusing President Bush of selling port security to a terrorist nation?"

Clinton should be jailed, IMHO. We'll be paying for his follies, and outright crimes for decades. Next question?

The UAE's view of us is not important in this matter. Their citizens were involved in committing and financing 9/11. We're trying to get them to examine their own behavior pre/post 9/11, and understand why ATM it's neither proper nor necessarily beneficial to have them managing port operations on our soil.

More importantly, ports management is a skill-set that we need to maintain domestically. Strategically, it's not in our long-term best interest to have foreign powers involved in sensitive infrastructure-type operations in America.