Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AT&T Hits Redial for an Old Strategy
Newsweek ^ | March 13, 2006 | Allan Sloan

Posted on 03/13/2006 4:04:16 PM PST by RWR8189

March 20, 2006 issue - Never count out a brand. Not long ago the once great AT&T name was headed for the boneyard, as was its former chairman's daring strategy of milking a cash-cow business for money to bet on fast-growth telecom. Now, as we see from last week's $90 billion telecom deal, both the AT&T name and its strategy are back. Big time. Who'da thunk it? When SBC Communications made a deal last winter to buy the shrunken remnants of faded blue-chip AT&T, it said it would eliminate the brand. Both AT&T Wireless and AT&T Broadband had previously been sold to buyers who gave up the name. Lights out for AT&T.

Surprise! SBC, a regional phone company serving 13 states, decided in November to scrap its own name and become AT&T. "No one outside our service area knew what SBC meant," says James Kahan, senior executive vice president for corporate development at SBC... oops, I mean AT&T.

When AT&T finishes buying BellSouth for about $67 billion in stock and $23 billion in assumed debt, AT&T will regain its status as the biggest name in telecom. The nation's biggest wireless company (54 million customers) and landline-phone company (71 million lines in 22 states) will be called AT&T. And AT&T will remain No. 1 in long distance.

When you crunch the numbers in this deal, you realize that not only the AT&T name is back. So is that old AT&T strategy of using money generated by a high-return but fading business to finance forays into faster-growing fields. "It's the same strategy and the same name," Kahan said when I raised the point with him, "but it's not the same company."

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: att; bellsouth; mabell; sbc; telecom; telecommunications

1 posted on 03/13/2006 4:04:21 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Ma Bell up from the canvas!


2 posted on 03/13/2006 4:13:44 PM PST by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Reminds me of the old SNL skit...

AT&T: We'll be a monopoly again!

3 posted on 03/13/2006 4:16:43 PM PST by TampaDude (If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the PROBLEM!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Is Judge Green still alive ?


4 posted on 03/13/2006 4:40:44 PM PST by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Thanks for explaining why my SW Bell phone bill now says AT&T. I feel like a dummy for not tracking regional news better.

It's impossible to escape from TPC, isn't it?


5 posted on 03/13/2006 4:49:51 PM PST by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

My SBC bill just came with AT&T logo.

Not only that, I called remnant AT&T to change to an unlimited long distance calling plan due to Mom and brother being sick and lots of long distance bills.

They gave me a real deal!! And backdated the phone bill to cover the last week since my last statement.

However, they still can't bundle my local SBC service with my AT&T long distance and send me one bill. Lady said that the merging of bills was about a year away.



6 posted on 03/13/2006 6:13:42 PM PST by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
My Sprint bill just came with a notice that they had changed their name to Embarq. Just like several others in the past (USUselessWest comes to mind) once they have lowered customer service levels to the lowest possible level, they change their name and start all over again.
7 posted on 03/13/2006 6:18:35 PM PST by JayNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Everything old is new again.


8 posted on 03/13/2006 7:47:26 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

A rather circuitous route to merely move the headquarters out of the corrupt NYC and the related costly union problems!


9 posted on 03/13/2006 7:54:15 PM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson