Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

Perhaps, though if any party can have a primary, it's not limited to just Democrats and Republicans.


40 posted on 03/13/2006 2:06:11 PM PST by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Young Scholar
"Perhaps, though if any party can have a primary, it's not limited to just Democrats and Republicans."

And I don't think I ever said anything about "Democrats and Republicans"---as long as ANY party participates in a process that uses tax dollars to fund the process, then the election should be open. If, for instance, an election has Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Greens and whoever else, then THOSE PARTIES SHOULD PAY FOR THE ELECTORAL PROCESS in proportion to the votes they get (or their party membership numbers---whichever the legislature decides is the fairest method).

If the courts say the "open primary" is unconstitutional on "right to free association" grounds, they should also find that tax-payer funded primaries are unconstitutional on "taxation without representation" grounds. Let the parties go back to caucuses and conventions, paid for by their own money.

43 posted on 03/14/2006 3:27:44 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson