Posted on 03/13/2006 8:22:38 AM PST by smokinleroy
Not wishing to declare party affiliation at poll
By John Reihart
Sherman
As a home owner and a card carrying registered voter, I was quite taken back when I stepped up to vote and was told by a woman to decide if I was a Republican or a Democrat; there, with others looking at me, I panicked.
Were they all Democrats or Republicans? What happens if I guess wrong? Is there a wrong? I said, I dont want to choose before I step into the voting booth, but was told, pick one or the other. What is this, I thought.
I vote for the individual and not always along party lines. But I was denied the right to vote because I did not exclaim my party affiliation before voting. I will see a lawyer because I have been denied the right to vote.
You can defend racial apartheid if you wish. I am talking about political parties, which are in essence formed to promote ideas. That is, they are expressive organizations and have the right to exclude or include whom they like.
Nope--not clueless--just independent.
And if you want to be "independent" of any parties, what makes you think you should decide whom they run for an office?
I came from one state that moved from a "party primary" to "open primary" (Louisiana), and moved to another state that had an "open primary" and was forced by the courts to implement a "party primary" against the wishes of the vast majority of the citizenry (Washington). The "open primary" is simply BETTER--less corruption, better candidates, and better results.
How do you figure an open primary acheives any of those things? Are you sure there's a logical connection?
I don't want liberals, socialists and those who don't have the best interests of my party deciding whom we run.
SD
It applies to ANY "right to free association" issue, which have routinely been decided in the courts AGAINST existence of any such right. There's a legal "logical disconnect" on the issue.
"And if you want to be "independent" of any parties, what makes you think you should decide whom they run for an office?"
Duh--because I'M BEING FORCE TO PAY FOR IT.
"How do you figure an open primary acheives any of those things? Are you sure there's a logical connection?"
Because that "open primary" was the reason Louisiana elected its first Republican governor in over a century. The "connection" was blatantly obvious.
And I don't think I ever said anything about "Democrats and Republicans"---as long as ANY party participates in a process that uses tax dollars to fund the process, then the election should be open. If, for instance, an election has Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Greens and whoever else, then THOSE PARTIES SHOULD PAY FOR THE ELECTORAL PROCESS in proportion to the votes they get (or their party membership numbers---whichever the legislature decides is the fairest method).
If the courts say the "open primary" is unconstitutional on "right to free association" grounds, they should also find that tax-payer funded primaries are unconstitutional on "taxation without representation" grounds. Let the parties go back to caucuses and conventions, paid for by their own money.
This happened in this very primary for Republican candidate for the Texas House district 62 seat. There were two candidates - very conservative incumbent Larry Phillips, and liberal democrat Charlie Williams who switched parties just in time for the election. Dems. haven't had much luck in these parts in the last few years, so they're trying new tactics.
Party registration in the district is pretty evenly split between (D) and (R), but in this election, around 11,000 voted as (R), and only 1,500 as (D). There are reports of a conspiracy for (D)'s to register as (R) in an attempt to oust Phillips. Williams was heavily supported by local teachers' unions. My neighbors, who are lifelong (D)'s had Williams signs in their front yard. Phillips won, 55% to 45%. He will now run against some (D) bozo who was unopposed in the (D) primary, and Phillips will get about 2/3 of the vote in Nov.
That would be fine with me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.