[LdSentinal]

If Bush was a globalist, then so was Reagan.

[1rudeboy]

Reagan is a hero because he placed tariffs on foreign motorcycles.
Bush is goat because he placed tariffs on foreign steel.

That's what passes for logic on these threads.

[Dane]

If Bush was a globalist, then so was Reagan

Won't matter, once the knee jerkers get stuck on a mantra, they are really stuck on it, even though this administartion has given the finger to the UN, more times than Reagan and Jeanne Kirkpatrick ever did.

[purpleland]

Shunning One World Government - the Grand Global Totalitariat with open borders is not "isolationism" nor is it xenophobic and racist!!! SHUNNING THE NEW WORLD ORDER MEANS SURVIVAL OF HUMANKIND - PROECTIONISM. Who in the what hell nefarious cabal would you have as administers of a One World Government? AKA as BIG BROTHER on BUREAUCRATIC REMOTE. The Global Conglomerate ruling elite can ONLY mean enslavement to and a pitiful dependence upon a remote unrepresentative government for everyone except the ruling elite and its operatives.
America used to be totally self-sustaining in all economic areas: agriculture, industry, manufacturing, financial, commerce and trade, etc. For the past 60 years, Congress' betrayal and political ideologues have kept piercing America's Achilles heel which is now exposed as a gapping wound.

[taxed2death]

"If Bush was a globalist, then so was Reagan."

Reagan had tariffs against Jap bikes.

Some Globalist.

[FixitGuy]

"If Bush was a globalist, then so was Reagan."

Didn't Globalism start with the Federal Reserve and then the Income tax as a way to rape the U.S. citizens to pay for the debt created by an out of control Congress who uses our own money to buy our votes?

Globalism is only proof that greed, materialism and human enslavement in the pursuit of riches has no boundaries!

Sorry, but I can't get past the riches and the money issues that seem to blur more noble spiritual pursuits. Obviously I have more work to do...

[TheForceOfOne]

bttt