Let's not exxagerate.
I linked to it twice.
The first time should need no explanation as it was dripping in relevance, and the 2nd time was in response to a poster's request for the date of the alleged comment because he/she had archived Levin's shows from last week and offered to provide a transcript for that day.
That poster subsequently provided the written text.
All this took place before Levin ever provided the audio links.
I was simply trying to aid in resolving the issue and the big dope (Levin) once again, had a kneejerk reaction.
To be clear, the transcript was provided after the audio links were made available by Levin.
All you've done is:
1. Continually refer to slanderous, demonstrably false statements made by a user who has now been banned.
2. Marke smart-aleck, derogatory comments directed at Mark Levin, and people like me, who agreed with him.
3. Cheered on Howlin.
I never said implied you and the now departed Bayourant were equally unsavory characters.
However, just because your actions weren't quite as objectionable as those of BR does not mean that they are laudable in any respect.
You asked my opinion and I gave it. I really don't care if you like it or not, I just gave you the courtesy of an answer.
As I said before, if you want to restart the fight with Mark, go for it.
You're still being hassled by this a day latter?
Clearly you were trying to resolve the issue.