Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Yeah, I suppose.

I wasn't implying that there should be an insurmountable standard erected for re-admittance, only that there was nothing so compelling or intriguing about this person that would merit such a request.

I guess if other people want to make a brief for him they're perfectly entitled to, but I agree with you in the sense that it's not much of an issue.

I just wanted to express my concern that other people would be willing to the mat for users who were rightfully banned, while not supporting other, much more worthy, cases.

825 posted on 03/13/2006 10:36:56 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 820 | View Replies ]


To: Do not dub me shapka broham
... only that there was nothing so compelling or intriguing about this person that would merit such a [re-admittance] request

I don't know, on way or the other. Never swapped barbs with the bloke, or took sides in concert. All I can say is the guy never got my attention as being an ass or a good-guy, and some FR posters get my attention those ways. Count me as a "no evidence" witness.

I'd go to bat in your favor, FWIW.

830 posted on 03/13/2006 10:49:30 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson