First of all, the fact that we've always had a Christian POTUS-in a country where over eighty percent of the population is Christian-is not in any way comparable to the ruthless, barbaric practices of a fascistic religious monarchy, which espouses the most austere, regressive, hostile elements of an already retrograde, stultified religious culture.
Neither the Congress nor the Chief executive is empowered to deny anyone their civil rights or civil liberties based upon their religious preference.
Furthermore, the United States government doesn't proselytize people into the Christian faith.
Far from it.
And having a hostile view of Muslims, and seeking their complete extermination and/or conversion are two entirely separate issues.
Your call for more integration is the straight out of the Eurabia handbook.
Eurabia is the name of a little journal founded in 1975 by the official perpetrators of the plot, of the conspiracy: the Association France-Pays Arabes in Paris, the Groupe d'Etudes sur le Moyen Orient in Geneva, and the European Coordinating Committee of the Association for Friendship wih the Arab World.
I suggest that you read Fallaci, and Bat Yeor, and Robert Spenser.
I already said I thought your point wasn't relevant to this issue. You've reduced its relevancy even further with this statement. You find it appropriate that a country which is over 80% Christian elects Christian leaders, but inappropriate that countries which are over 90% Muslim elect Muslim leaders?! As for the rest of your post, I am very familiar with American civics and Islamic fundamentalism. I also understand that you cannot destroy Islamic fundamentalism with force. That's already been tried. It doesn't work. They are like roaches. But you can't live with them either. The best solution is to turn them on themselves, and let the cancer eat itself. Opening a Starbucks next to a Mosque is one of the first, small steps.