Subjecting to foreign law = bad.
Now, what has Dubya done to further the globalist quest to replace our Constitution and laws with some international authority?
He's rejected Kyoto.
He ignored France, Germany and Russia in invading Iraq.
He appointed a hard-nose skeptic as ambassador to the UN.
He supports the death penalty and opposes gun control despite European fashion.
He has appointed Supreme Court justices who have specifically rejected using foreign law concerning their decisions.
I'm happy with him.
Facts have no place here. ;-)
Good Buchanites have their propaganda down, but exposing facts that contradict the propaganda is too much to ask them to reconcile.
But, you are deadly accurate in the last one. Can't imagine how a true "Globalist" could have screwed up so royally in selecting two Justices that reject foreign law. Once could be a mistake. But twice? :-)
As well that pesky Bolton he even circumvented Congress and Voinovich's weeping out there to give us a voice. Must have been an off day for the "Globalist".
GITMO is still up and running, despite the world's opinions...
He left the U.N. out when he "unilaterally" decided how to get help to the Tsunami victims quickly, only a few pals invited in there. A real Globalist really should have let people die until the WORLD was onboard.
Geez, Bush is giving his "globalist" image a bad rep with these actions and more.
It's Sunday night. Drudge has nothing better to do.
Quite disconcerting to see such rush to judgment posts...as bad a room full full of demorat/socialists
shame on you other posters
Very well said! What do these Isolationist-types expect us to do? Cut ourselves off from the rest of the human race? Despite a recurring myth, THIS COUNTRY HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATIONIST and has been globally involved since the earliest days of our Republic!