Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion

A good case can be built that Saddam did NOT send his WMDs to Syria. Yes, the Russians had plenty to remove before the US and allies invaded and Syria was the closest place to hide records, booty, and whatever else they didn't want the Americans to find.

But Saddam most likely hid his chemical and biological weapons in several large bunkers in southern Iraq that the US knows about but has not yet opened because they would have to divert river and canal to do so. They are safely there out of harm's way. The Bush administration is more concerned with fighting the WOT and killing terrorists drawn to Iraq by the illusion of the US's weakness--an illusion brought about by the MSM and the Dems.

So it is helpful at this stage of the war to not reveal the presence of WMD so that the enemies keep up investing in their losing tactics. This stage is almost over, imho, and we must soon deal with Iran.


22 posted on 03/12/2006 3:14:29 PM PST by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Poincare
This stage is almost over, imho, and we must soon deal with Iran.

Who would it benefit more if we knew where the WMD's are and realease the info now?

Republicans?
Terrorist?

Where are most of the terrorist coming from?

25 posted on 03/12/2006 3:27:11 PM PST by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson