Well, there are villages and other communities that spawn these terrorists. You don't think that Afghanistan become one big puree after 9/11?
Here's the WND link:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49224
Good Luck.
I went back and read it over again. We all like a good puzzle. For the sake of discussion, can anyone make anything out of this or is it mumbo-jumbo?
"...Let me now inform you why we opted to inform you about the two operations and your inability to stop them before they are carried out. The reason is simple: You cannot uncover or stop them except by letting them be carried out. Furthermore, the best you could do would be to accelerate the day of carrying out the operations. In other words, if we schedule the operation to take place tomorrow, the best you could do is to make it happen today...."
"...This indeed is a sweet situation to be in," he says. "It is a win-win all the way for us. It is the ultimate control and the most stunning way to stop an operation (accelerating it with the same impact). What we are saying is this: You will have a choice of either let us carry it out on our own schedule and with our own hands or allow your own intelligence apparatus to cause it to happen. This second choice will cause a level of dissatisfaction (with your decision makers) to reach its highest level. Therefore, your Homeland Security agencies would have no choice but to surrender and wait for the inevitable to happen...."
=======
For discussion, assume there might be something behind the threat. I am interested in what some of you have to say. Seriously.