Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A. Pole
They had no choice - they were losing the case.

That's because those fools were to shortsighted, if they had let Milosevic win the case it would have legitimized the World Court by stating that you can be found innocent and let go.

Now, with them killing Milosevic, they have destroyed any legitimacy they may have had by them stating that if they cannot find a person guilty, they will just kill them before the trial ends.

Milosevic would have probably died within ten years anyway and he would have died in obscurity, all but forgotten, but now he is martyred and will probably be remembered for a lot longer.

Along with that, people now can use Milosevic's death as a justification to disband the world court in that anyone charged by the world court can now state that they will not get a fair trial and if they cannot be found guilty, they will be killed by the world court before the trial ends.

63 posted on 03/12/2006 1:27:05 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Paul C. Jesup; A. Pole; Incorrigible; WoofDog123
Paul C. Jesup stated: That's because those fools were to shortsighted, if they had let Milosevic win the case it would have legitimized the World Court by stating that you can be found innocent and let go.

Slobo would have then been arrested in the Hague and sent back to Belgrade to face (true) charges.

Paul C. Jesup thinks like a rational person.

Paul, I would submit to you my thoughts as I stated them to a.pole.

The so called ICTY court was supposed to serve 2 purposes - one was a political one as a weapon against resistance in Yugoslavia. The other was to serve as a pilot court for the establishment of the UN's International criminal court.

They did not count on Slobo outfighting them and delaying their case and the UN Court came into being without the glory the trial of Slobo was supposed to shower such a court. In fact the way the Slobo trial was being badly conducted served as a rallying point for those against the UN Intl. Criminal Court. Slobo came close to sabotaging its coming into being.

The other reason - to use Slobo as a tool to make the Serbs compliant and remorseful and accepting of domination failed as well. Serbian resistance to the international community stiffened.

The verdict meant nothing in the context of the above failures.

The show trial was always supposed to end with Slobo being found guilty of genocide. If that happened now people would scoff at the verdict. If they found him innocent of genocide and guilty of the lesser counts that would have made a mockery of the court as well because the international community would be made to look foolish after we were told for years Slobo was Hitler.

He had to die in this manner. In fact I think the trial was delayed by the prosecution this long waiting for him to die before the verdict would be possible.

70 posted on 03/12/2006 1:43:28 PM PST by Proctor (http://www.historyofjihad.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson