Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rodguy911
rodguy911, your anger at the war coverage is reasonable and understandable. Brit had Col. Peter on his show saying all the good things our soldiers were doing. He just returned from Iraq.

Max Boot reports from Iraq - What MSM fails to report.

Pretty much everyone currently in Iraq enlisted or reenlisted knowing that he or she would be sent to war. (The use of "she" isn't just political correctness--there are lots of women here, and they are not just performing traditional support functions, such as nurses or clerks. I saw female soldiers skillfully handling .50 caliber machine guns on patrol.) Not only do service personnel cheerfully face danger beyond the imagination of your average cubicle dweller, but they also work harder than an investment banker--and for a fraction of the salary.

"I've never worked as little as a 12-hour day yet," one sergeant told me. Eighteen-hour days seem to be the norm, and days off are unheard of. (Soldiers do get a couple of weeks of R&R in the rear or back home in the middle of a one-year deployment.) In many units, one soldier will be sent to fetch lunch from the DFAC (dining facility) so that everyone else can continue working. Others skip lunch altogether or gobble a PowerBar on the run.

One colonel, a brigade commander, told me that the only break he gets comes when he gets his hair cut. I believe him--after all, we were conducting our interview at 10 p.m., and he was still in the office. "If you work 18 hours a day, seven days a week, and you don't drink alcohol, it's amazing how much you can get done," a senior general joked.

Why even Fox is relying on these liers in the media - I don't understand.

414 posted on 03/12/2006 7:32:24 AM PST by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies ]


To: anita
Great link here anita. To me the two most important things a President can be concerned about during a time of war, and we are engaging in a WOT not just n Iraq but in numerous countries, are the welfare of the troops and the progress of the war. Our President is totally engaged in both, IMHO. Not to support his initiatives during a time of war is basically unthinkable to me. Those who oppose him, purely for political gain, to look good for a left wing constituency, bring American politics to a new low IMHO. The troops need to come first, politics second,, That's another reason UAE mad me so mad, GW put valued intel from Dubai first, while our congrescritters put their own political welfare first. I still can't fathom it.
561 posted on 03/12/2006 8:29:55 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support the New Media and F.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson