Skip to comments.
U.S. Squeezes North Korea's Money Flow(envisions more actions to anger North Korea)
NYT ^
| 03/10/06
| JOEL BRINKLEY
Posted on 03/12/2006 4:42:05 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
There weill be more pain for Kim Jong-il. For Kim Dae-jung, and Roh Moo-hyun, as well.
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...
To: TigerLikesRooster
From the article
This policy is not uniformly popular in the State Department, where officials are managing the six-nations talks that include the United States, Russia, South Korea, China and Japan. One senior official complained that the policy would turn the talks into nothing more than "a surrender mechanism."
Memo to State Department:
Could someone please explain why a North Korean surrender is something you would NOT like to see?
(sigh) Once again, I am reminded of the story of a U.S. Naval Officer walking down the sidewalk near the State Department building one day in Washington, when a little old lady walks up and says "Excuse me Sir? I'm just visiting, and I seem to have lost my way, could you tell me which side the State Department is on?"
And the Naval Officer replies without skipping a beat, "Well Mam, they're SUPPOSED to be on OUR side!"
3
posted on
03/12/2006 4:53:11 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Anything that hurts sawed off, four eyed, psychotic chia pet they use for a glorious leader is fine by me.
4
posted on
03/12/2006 4:53:35 AM PST
by
TXBSAFH
(Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
To: TXBSAFH
LMAO! What a perfect description of that genocidal freakazoid.
5
posted on
03/12/2006 4:55:47 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: TXBSAFH
Anything that hurts sawed off, four eyed, psychotic chia pet they use for a glorious leader is fine by me.
Did you know he once hit 18 holes-in-one on an 18 hole course? /wacky North Korean propaganda claims
6
posted on
03/12/2006 5:04:08 AM PST
by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: starbase
The biggest problem with this bank was that it was laundering North Korea's counterfeit money (at least 20% of the US$100 bills in circulation are North Korean counterfeits) and laundering North Korea's drug money.
You'd almost think the NYTimes is in favor of these activites now.
To: TigerLikesRooster
If they really want to succeed they'll keep their mouths shut rather than brag to the NYT. North Korea like all communist dictatorships would rather self-destruct than admit defeat to capitalists.
8
posted on
03/12/2006 5:30:42 AM PST
by
bkepley
To: bkepley
Re #8
You need to publicize something to keep Demo's mouth shut. Otherwise, they would keep yapping, "Nothing is done. N. Korea policy is a failure ...."
To: starbase
Better chance of pigs flying out his backsides.
10
posted on
03/12/2006 5:36:03 AM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: Joe Boucher
Here's a
funny article about all the ridiculously impossible things North Korea claims Kim can do.
Like he knows all the phone numbers and computer access codes for everyone in the country. I got the golf claim wrong, he supposedly only hit 11 holes in one.
And he can go to the cemetery and remember everyone there, what they did in life and what they accomplished and liked and disliked.
Pretty funny stuff. At least Soviet propaganda was remotely reasonable, but this N. Korean stuff is truly wacky.
11
posted on
03/12/2006 5:48:47 AM PST
by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: starbase
Not too hard to remember all three private phone numbers in N. Korea.
Man I was in Pyongyong in 1973 for about an hour. Worked at the command center in Seoul Korea. U.N. observers were flown by helicopters from the south every month and exchanged for those already done with their month. Place was devoid of private vehicles as well as electrical anything. Poor isn't the word.
Clean as can be but noooooo fun.
12
posted on
03/12/2006 6:03:51 AM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: starbase
"The memory of a person gets better when a person uses their brain often," he was quoted as saying. Sounds like we should be using our brain often then.
13
posted on
03/12/2006 6:05:35 AM PST
by
ThirstyMan
(hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
To: starbase
hit 11 holes in one
Big deal, I could do that....If I had an army of people who had to rapidly dig a hole beneath where my ball landed or face execution.
14
posted on
03/12/2006 7:39:35 AM PST
by
DancesWithBolsheviks
(No guestworkers while able bodied and sane people are on our welfare rolls.)
To: JustDoItAlways
(at least 20% of the US$100 bills in circulation are North Korean counterfeits) The 1996 series. It is so bad that you can not exchange these bills overseas.
To: TigerLikesRooster
16
posted on
03/12/2006 8:24:41 AM PST
by
CowboyJay
(Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
To: TigerLikesRooster
"It really struck a nerve," Kim Jong-il has met his worst enemy for his whole being is "nerve"!
17
posted on
03/12/2006 1:24:10 PM PST
by
EGPWS
To: TigerLikesRooster
There weill be more pain for Kim Jong-il"I'm so ronery...and so bloke..."
18
posted on
03/12/2006 1:27:57 PM PST
by
BeHoldAPaleHorse
(Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
To: mkjessup
This policy is not uniformly popular in the State Department, where officials are managing the six-nations talksWhadduhsupprise. Why take action when we can advance our careers by holding interminable and unproductive "negotiations" ad nauseam?
This is a very good sign in that it suggests a renewed focus away from the fruitless and useless "negotiations" on the nuclear issue to the larger issue of fighting the WoT by undermining the axis of evil altogether.
Weakening the regime will yield more results than trudging slowly toward some meaningless clintonoid "arms agreement."
To: mkjessup
Well Mam, they're SUPPOSED to be on OUR side!"
Since when? Did we sign some kind of treaty?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson