Selective coverage by biased media

Sun Sentinel ^ | March 10 2006 | James J. Pirretti

[noblejones]

>>
. . . MSM are first and foremost big business . . .
<<

And that's why they knowingly continue to alienate more than half their potential audience even as their stock values crash?

How can you trust an industry, in the case of the print media, who's business model is to champion people who can't and won't read their product?

[Galveston Grl]

**It is simple, the MSM hates President Bush!**

The old media is a branch of the Democrat Party. They hate all Republicans who are not RINOs and they barely tolerate RINOs when they are elected.

[Richard Axtell]

This "Cobra II" book is CYA for the MSM, revealing nothing we didn't know, and professing that Bush ignored good advice. NOTHING mentioned would have resulted in success. The authors engage in a great deal of assumption-making regarding micromanagement of everything from troop movements to PR, also with the assumption that no serious analysis or criticism of the book will be forth coming.

This is just more "Bush Lied" when all the growing body of evidence says is that "Saddam fooled the left" and continues to. The WMD issue is one that the NYT and its Democrat allies had best leave alone, as they have worn out that avenue of demagoguery,

Not one word on the considerable aid and comfort afforded by the leftist press and the Democrats, like Durbin, Rockefeller, Leahy, Kennedy, Pelosi an Murtha, and how the insurgency has been prolonged by the Cronkite-like effect their duplicity and fraud. I look forward to real analysis of how the Democrats and the left have undermined our national security, and now brazenly try to capitalize on it. That is what we need to know.