Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123
Good afternoon.
"if, as you suggest, he spent his career typing out reports, he still might know more than some of his critics here."

Read the whole post, Woof. I said that my statement was uncalled for and that we know very little about Ben's military career.

All we really know that matters is the fact that he is allied with our enemy. That should be enough for anyone.

Michael Frazier
153 posted on 03/14/2006 4:31:39 PM PST by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: brazzaville

You did suggest it and 'taking it back' a sentence later is not the same as simply deleting the 'taken back' text and never posting it. Blog is not the same as telegraph - presumably what you post, with 'take backs' and all, is what you want to say.

Your argument would make more sense if it was a follow-up 'take back' post to a previous post.

In the future the best way to take something back is 'backspace' or highlight the text and push 'backspace' if you have not already posted it. Otherwise reasonable people will assume you are actually saying the thing you type out then renounce a paragraph later and just being disingenous about it.



157 posted on 03/14/2006 5:08:02 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson