Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Singapore Stumbles
Singapore-Window.org ^ | March 20, 2006 | Eric Ellis

Posted on 03/11/2006 3:54:49 PM PST by Brian Allen

Are [The minders of Ho Ching [The wife of Singapore prime-minister-by-order-of-his-father and poster-child of Singapore's corrupt nepotism*] losing their touch?

That's what some are asking about Temasek Holdings' chief executive after a string of embarrassing setbacks.

In February the Singapore government's wholly owned PSA was trumped by Dubai's deep-pocket sheikhs, who outbid it for Britain's port operator, P&O.

Temasek walked away with a $50 million profit on its stake, but it was cold comfort for losing the chance to become the world's No. 1 port operator. [Though subsequent challenges could yet undo the Dubai deal]

Then Temasek's $1.9 billion purchase of Thailand's Shin Corp, owned by prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, filled Bangkok's streets with protest.

Thais are grumpy that Thaksin paid no tax on his windfall and that he sold strategic assets to a foreign-government-owned agency.

"Temasek underestimated the political fallout," says Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a professor at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University. "The deal has not been transparent. Whether they like it or not, Temasek has made itself a player in Thai politics, and that puts its investment at risk."

Temasek is also under fire in Jakarta, where politicians want it to unwind its investment in communications giant Indosat. With another Temasek-owned company, SingTel, owning a half stake in competing mobile operator Telkomsel, they fret about Singaporean domination of Indonesia's phone market. That was after the Indian government denied Temasek approval to buy into mobile operator Idea Cellular, India's fifth-largest, because SingTel already owns part of Bharti, the No. 1 operator.

Temasek's problem--and advantage--is that it is 100% owned by Singapore's Ministry of Finance. Its board is studded with bureaucrats and businessmen.

Its $80 billion portfolio includes majority stakes in most of the city-state's leading companies, including Singapore Airlines and defense contractor Singapore Technologies. CEO Ho is the wife of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who is also Finance Minister.

With that pedigree, it is little wonder Temasek gets its calls returned. But it also makes it a magnet for controversy across Asia, where the trend is for governments to get out of business. Even in Singapore some consider Temasek too powerful. "Singapore would be better served," says Manu Bhaskaran, CEO of Centennial Asia Advisors, a Singapore economic-risk consultancy, "with companies in the hands of an array of private-sector shareholders."

Some of Temasek's investments are proving troublesome on the financial as well as the political front. Fiber-optic cable operator Global Crossing, in which Temasek took a 62% stake in 2003, lost $336 million in 2004 and another $278 million in the first nine months of last year. In February the Temasek-controlled DBS Bank took a $700 million writedown on its Hong Kong operation, the former Dao Heng Bank, which it bought in 2001 for $5.4 billion, a price it said then was fully valued. And Temasek's 60%-owned wafer business, Chartered Semiconductor, although poised for a turnaround, has had losses of more than $1 billion since 2001. Chartered shares have lost 90% of their value since 1999, an affront to Ho's mantra that Temasek is a value investor.

To be sure, market leaders like Singapore Airlines and SingTel are stellar performers, helping bring Temasek profits of $4.7 billion on revenue of $42.2 billion for the past fiscal year. But some, like Steve Chia, a member of Singapore's Parliament, don't think that's good enough. Chia described Temasek's shareholder return of 1% annually over the past five years as "poor," compared with the Singapore Straits Times Index's 2.7% gain over the same period.

Temasek, which declined to make Ho or any other executives available for comment, has maintained that it is simply a benign investor and that there's no government involvement in its dealmaking. Perhaps. But that's not how others see it. "We hear a lot from Singaporeans about transparency and what integrity they have in business," says Thitinan, the Thai professor, of the Shin Corp. deal. "But I'm afraid that by their own standards, Temasek has failed the test."

[* - B A]


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintons; corruption; dnc; foreignownership; hillaryscandals; riady
<< In February the Singapore government's wholly owned PSA was trumped by Dubai's deep-pocket sheikhs, who outbid it for Britain's port operator, P&O.

Temasek walked away with a $50 million profit on its stake, but it was cold comfort for losing the chance to become the world's No. 1 port operator. [Though "subsequent challenges" could yet undo the Dubai deal]

"Subsequent challenges," that is, led by such as Schumer and King and Menendez and Mrs Cli'ton et al - every one of whom an unregistered agent for the foreign government Singapore gang and its Communist Chinese cohorts and for the Burmese drugs and other contraband-connected Mafia racketeers who, through and with their RICO-racketeering mobbed-up maritime and water'front' "unions," own operate and control every aspect of every activity -- including so-called "security" -- at every one of the East Coast Ports recently in the news.

And at every major West Coast port.

And, least we ever forget, at both ends of America's Panama Canal.

Hell, it would seem, hath no fury like a [Singapore's petty dictator Lee's] scorned woman!

1 posted on 03/11/2006 3:54:50 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

Interesting supposition. No question that the clintons had all sort of lucrative Asian connections while in office. This is the first suggestion I have seen that these connections may have had a role in what happened.


2 posted on 03/11/2006 4:02:29 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; Mia T

<< No question that the clintons had all sort of lucrative Asian connections while in office. >>

One third of the clintons is still in office.

One third, more insidiously, oversees the Rich/Soros/Jiang Gang/Riady/Columbia/Cocaine etceteras-provided family 'trusts.'

The drone, meanwhile, provides carefully and cynically calculated distractions and runs interference. All the while playing all sides against every other.

Protected from the otherwise deadly consequences of his actions by the United States Secret Service.

The new Good Fellows?

ping


3 posted on 03/11/2006 4:15:48 PM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

After Vince Foster was murdered, hillary personally made the runs to Switzerland to deposit rakeoff money in numbered Swiss Bank accounts. No question that they are still raking it in as fast as they can.

You can't even shake hands with billyjeff without paying $10,000 for the privilege. They must have billions stashed away in numbered accounts, and it's still flowing in fast.


4 posted on 03/11/2006 4:22:59 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

<< ... They must have Billions stashed away ... >>

The Chelsea Clinton's 'Trust' is authoritively estimated to be worth between Three and Four Billion Dollars.


5 posted on 03/11/2006 5:38:02 PM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Dear Cicero,

I've shaken Mr. Clinton's hand on several occasions, and never had to pay for it.

I did later thoroughly wash my hand with lye soap.


sitetest


6 posted on 03/11/2006 5:40:57 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY:
HOW DECADES OF CLINTON DOUBLE-DEALING COMPROMISED OUR NATIONAL SECURITY



7 posted on 03/11/2006 5:50:27 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

As the old pre-PC cliché used to say, 'They're cunning, these Chinese.'

And more capable by far than any 100 failed and/or disbarred and/or Narcissistic Arkansan shyster of staying out of site whilst insidiously playing every side against every other -- and the middle.

And what better surrogate, now the Riaddy Gang is way too well exposed, than the ass-deep in Burma's drug trade and China's counterfeiting slicker'n'sn*t Singaporeans?


8 posted on 03/11/2006 7:13:07 PM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

marker


9 posted on 03/12/2006 10:00:58 AM PST by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson