[Mind-numbed Robot]

Very good article, thanks.

If only someone with face time on a major network would explain the situation like this. The obvious inference is that the MSM and the Democrats want the USA to lose this war.

What we need to do we can't do because of the Democrats desire to impeach Bush at the drop of a hat. They will do anything to regain power and in that pursuit they want the enemy to win so the can criticize Bush and the Republicans and they want to have a reason to try to impeach Bush even though it would never succeed. As always with them , the accusation is enough.

With a free hand, meaning without having to go to Congress, the UN, and all the other people that will demand consultation, which in itself would destroy the effectiveness of the action, Bush should do what he originally said. Those who support the terrorists are equally guilty and will be dealt with as such.

Although he missed him, Reagan put a missile through Qaddafi's tent and straightened him up for awhile. Bush should do the same with Iran, Syria, the PLA, or whomever. If a terrorist attack cast suspicion on a country strike at the leadership. We don't need to wait for iron clad proof, only suspicion would suffice.

But once again, because we are a free country who follows a moral code, at least when the Republicans are in charge, we can't do what needs to be done. Maybe after the next president is elected Bush can act while still in office. Impeachment wouldn't be much of a threat then nor an unacceptable sacrifice for doing the right thing.

[DeweyCA]

What we need to do we can't do because of the Democrats desire to impeach Bush at the drop of a hat. They will do anything to regain power and in that pursuit they want the enemy to win so the can criticize Bush and the Republicans and they want to have a reason to try to impeach Bush even though it would never succeed. As always with them , the accusation is enough.

This is exactly the situation. Spot on.