Replies

I was addressing your statement If these folks can't see immigration as a security issue, the Republicans can stand losing grassroots support and there will be a Rat house in '07. So be it.

I presumed that you will stay home (not vote) and allow a liberal Dem victory in November to make a self-defeating and futile point. I was commenting upon that. Sorry it wasn't clearer.

You see, if those opposed to strong national defense are returned to power, it will make things worse for you, not better. If Dems return to power because some single-issue concerns motivate staying home in droves, the courts go back toward the left; national health care will descend as a pall upon the economy, immigration will become even more of a problem, and so forth.

Besides, immigration laws have been enforced. There have been many convictions and prison terms meted out in the last couple of years. Read polipundit.com regularly to catch some of that news. It is not as if all enforcement has been suspended!

Worried your gravy train is coming to an end?

What on earth is this ad hominem attack supposed to mean?

The point is conservatives are less scared of the Democrats when there is no difference in whether the conservative agenda is enacted by beltway bandits with an R or D in front or behind their name. The difference is the sales pitch and rate of entropy.

If you cannot see the security issue in lack of immigration enforcement by the Bush administration you have not been awake.

Pandering to the hispanics and islamists does not make good local or foreign policy. Why should US soldiers die defending the borders of Iraq from Iran and Syria when there is no enforcment of US borders, there are estimates of between 13 and 35 million illegal immigrants living in the USA. Good security begins at home.

If you are not one of the fortunate son globalists you belong neither to the Democrats or the Republicans. Big tent reduces the Republicans to Dhimmitude of the islamists, hispanderers and globalists to the detriment of taxpayers and US Citizens.

Bush may have a great Department of Defense staff, they are non partisan by nature and by law, excluding the political appointees. Having a democrat administration will change the top military appointees, but will not force mass retirements of those whose allegiances are to the service and professionalism vice political cronyism. You dont get to be a 3 or 4 star general soley by political affiliation.

US Citizens should be heard above the globalist hispandering dhimmis.

Grover Norquist may have great wednesday meetings, he certainly does not represent conservatives. He represents his own self interests as a paid globalist Saudi wahabbist agent. Party affiliation is meaningless if the results of their agendas are the same.