[snarks_when_bored]

This sobering assessment of what England is facing was written by a well-educated, former muslim who converted to Christianity. He's attempting to sound the alarm about the plans and designs that radical imams and their followers have up their sleeves (in addition to the long knives and explosives, of course).

Apparently, the Telegraph, which originally published the article, pulled it for "legal reasons". You can follow the link at the bottom of the article and see for yourself.

[Brilliant]

Muslims are like fire ants. You just can't control them.

[Rummyfan]

Also here with extensive comments:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1581575/posts

[snarks_when_bored]

It seems this thread is a duplicate. Pull it if you deem it pull-worthy!

[EASYACES]

The Australian Foreign Minister's recent comments regarding the Muslims in that country should be the standard for ALL non-muslim countries. "Accept the host country's constitution and all laws or GO HOME!" Should they not choose that option, DEPORTATION is the only remedy.

[Gritty]

Islamic clerics do not believe in a society in which Islam is one religion among others in a society ruled by basically non-religious laws. They believe it must be the dominant religion - and it is their aim to achieve this. That is why they do not believe in integration.

Excellent article. But is anybody in Great Britain listening? For that matter, is anybody in America listening, besides us?

[bereanway]

A lot of what he says makes sense; however, I'm not convinced the steps he's recommending will solve the problem. No doubt, it's the clerics who are the primary voices of this hate but, they do have the theological and historical backing of their source documents.

Given Islam's demands upon its adherents to enslave, convert or kill and ultimately rule any and every area of the planet coexistence doesn't seem possible. In the long run Islam cannot coexist peaceably in the west. It's a festering sore which at some point will have to be dealt with.

[1903A3]

Why not
Let them have a separate state
Then nuke it

[metesky]

Introduction

The Islamic Shari'a Council was established in 1982 in a meeting attended by various scholars representing a number of mosques in the UK. The main function of the council is to guide the Muslims in the UK in matters related to religious issues as well as solving their matrimonial problems which are referred to it by the Muslims of this country. This Council is a registered charity under the Reg. No: 1003855. The Council is a Welfare and none-profit-making charity.

Aims and Objectives

The objectives of the Council are:

To advance the Islamic Religion by:

• Fostering and encouraging the practice of the Muslim faith according to the Quran and the Sunnah.

• Providing advice and assistance in the operation of Muslim family.

• Establishing a bench to operate as court of Islamic Shari'a and to make decisions on matters of Muslim Family law referred to it.

• Doing all such other lawful things as may be in the interest of promoting the proper practice of the Muslim faith in the United Kingdom.

You'll probably want to clear your cookies and wash your hands...

[Just A Nobody]

"The whole approach towards Muslim militants was based on appeasement. 7/7 proved that that approach does not work - yet it is still being followed."

This article is worth studying carefully, IMHO. It was also posted on 2-19-06, but I did not see any of you there so here is the link.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1581575/posts?q=1&&page=1

[El Gato]

The chapters are not written to be read in that way. Indeed, after the first chapter, the chapters of the Koran are ordered according to their length, not according to their content or chronology: the longest chapters are first, the shorter ones are at the end. "You need to know which passage was revealed at what period and in what time in order to be able to understand it - you cannot simply read it from beginning to end and expect to learn anything at all.

Even their holy book is stupid. But of course having it arranged that way makes it difficult to understand, or even follow. Thus the need for an Imam or Mullah to tell you what it means. Far too many seem to think it says "Kill the Infidels", which of course it does in a few places, but so does the Old Testament. But you don't see many Rabbis emphasizing that message these days (or anytime, at least since well before the diaspora)

[bill1952]

'Islamic clerics do not believe in a society in which Islam is one religion among others in a society ruled by basically non-religious laws.
They believe it must be the dominant religion - and it is their aim to achieve this.
"That is why they do not believe in integration.
In 1980, the Islamic Council of Europe laid out their strategy for the future - and the fundamental rule was never dilute your presence.
That is to say, do not integrate

And that is why they cannot be defeated by people who believe in nothing.

Keep up the multi cultural nonsense, and also keep up the fiction that the ancient values of Western Civilization are no more worthy than any others, and you will soon see an end to multi culturalism.

only you will be dead

[Tony O]

England should do what the Germans are looking at doing (posted on an earlier thread), which is looking into outlawing practices in the Koran that voilate the German constitution.

[Tony O]

OOPS!

voilate = violate

[starbase]

There should be no compromise over education, or over English as the language of education. The policy of political multiculturalism should be reversed.

We have a winner!!!!!!!!!!!!

(though with Mohammedanism even this (and it's not going to happen anyway) may not be enough)

[righttackle44]

"This sobering assessment of what England is facing was written by a well-educated, former muslim who converted to Christianity. He's attempting to sound the alarm. . . ."

Thank you for posting this, and thank you for point out
the writer's credentials--impressive credentials.

I'd figured this sort of thing was up the collective Muslim sleeve, but it's interesting to see the precursors documented so well. The Telegraph, wheter they intended to or not, has produced what I think is one of the most important documents of the 21st Century by publishing this (and then pulling it).

[Just A Nobody]

1-4-06 President Bush discusses the WOT: ...we talked about the areas of concern in this global war on terror, recognizing that the enemy, which has an ideology of hate and a desire to kill, lurks in parts around the world.

The United States will not retreat from the world, and we will never surrender to evil.
President George W. Bush, SOTU 1-31-06

[ScreamingFist]

This story has been removed for legal reasons (Filed: 19/02/2006)

I find this more telling than the article itself.....thanks for the post.