[Alia]

When I was in CA, I heard "bureacratic" liberals discuss this matter in a forum. Their reasoning was that most kids have had the "new age", Sheila-Kuehlian type of sex education. Therefore, they reasoned, if an underage person engages in any sexual conduct it is by "ipso facto" consent.

And in some of the special programs brought into the schools under the "tolerance" mantle, there are forms that students are signing which can be used in court against them which imply consent.

[kitkat]

***And in some of the special programs brought into the schools under the "tolerance" mantle, there are forms that students are signing which can be used in court against them which imply consent.***

Alia, I'm totally flummoxed by that statement. Since when is a signature by a minor legal? I'm guessing it means signatures by their parents giving consent to sex ed w/o their knowing just what their kids are being taught.

[gidget7]

You post explains why that sexuality education is in schools in the first place. These Judges should be run out of town.