I think you are dead wrong on this one, with all due respect. It is an absurd decision, period. You can try to have your pissing match with Serp all day, but he/she explained very well what he/she wrote.
You are smearing SD unjustly as a liar or a prevaricator of truth. Not true. Not on this thread at least. For that, you should apologize.
IMHO
Sorry, but you are wrong.
Again, the decision to suspend or not is irrelevant and not the discussion at hand.
SD posted inaccurate information.
I called her on it, rather politely even.
She was wrong, but rather than admit it, or just ignore it, she accepts a conditional apology from me even though the conditions of the apology were not met. (I consider this very rude and of very poor form).
I point out her errors and now I am accused of injuring her good name.
Why won't you defend my name? I never called her a liar as you claim. Show me where or when I claimed she was lying. Instead, I assumed she was in error and provided her a means to correct the error. For this I am attacked.
Woe that I should suffer the arrows of injustice for so valiant a cause.
My point is: this was a simple matter that SD decided to escalate.
She was wrong when she posted the information and wrong when she attempted to accept my conditional apology.