[junta]

I would rather have an American owned and operated company to run the ports. I prefer Americans, is that ignorant?

[Dane]

I would rather have an American owned and operated company to run the ports. I prefer Americans, is that ignorant?

I'd rather have a company that has a worldwide reputation(Australia, Germany, South Korea) of being a clean and well run compnay leasing terminals at US ports, than the cronyistic American companies beholden to the mob run unions and DNC such as Eller & Co. that went to chuckie schumer to whip up hysteria which you bought.

[Right_in_Virginia]

I would rather have an American owned and operated company to run the ports. I prefer Americans, is that ignorant?

America would continue to own and run the ports, just like we ran and owned Boston and DC airports on 9/11.

[John Valentine]

I would rather have an American owned and operated company to run the ports.

And I'd rather drive a Bentley. So what?

What is it about the running of cargo terminals that makes you think that you ought to have a say in the ownership of the companies that own the operating rights?

This is a purely commercial deal that has nothing whatsoever to do with your thoughts, feelings or concerns unless you happen to be a stockholder.

Also, why are you coming to this party just now?

Where have you been for the paast fifty years? American cargo terminals have had a number of foreign owners, including companies from Norway, Britain, Holland, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, China and others for decades.

You are either a Democrat trying to make points on a manufactured crisis, or you are part of their stampede.

I'll stick with ignorant in either scenario.