Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt; frankjr; Howlin; Peach
The WH could refuse, leading to a dismissal of charges.
2 posted on 03/10/2006 2:47:03 PM PST by Perdogg (The Opinions expressed by Perdogg are correct and should be relied upon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg

I don't think the WH will refuse (exec. priviledge, I guess) outright because they won't want to be seen as killing this case themselves.

Unless this is an attempt to force the WH to kill the case. I've always felt that Fitz wants a way out of this.


13 posted on 03/10/2006 3:12:05 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
The WH could refuse, leading to a dismissal of charges.

I wish they'd do that. All Libby was trying to do was defend the administration against the lies of Joe Wilson.

16 posted on 03/10/2006 3:14:25 PM PST by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

This is an interesting development. Thanks for the ping or I'd have missed this.


23 posted on 03/10/2006 3:24:08 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
"The WH could refuse, leading to a dismissal of charges."

Yes. This is a promising gambit: ask for something you know you won't be allowed to have, then move for dismissal. Bright move, and better than even odds it'll work.
56 posted on 03/10/2006 10:20:24 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast (You're it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson