Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arabs drop ports deal; S. Fla. firm in running [Eller]
Miami Herald ^ | 03/10/06 | JAMES KUHNHENN AND STEVE HARRISON

Posted on 03/10/2006 2:06:13 PM PST by syriacus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: CA Conservative

"Sorry, the priciple is the same - taking something of value from the rightful owner, and giving it to someone else."

The "rightful owner" in this instance is the governmental entity that has authorized the leasing of the property, which is already public property, the permissible taking of which is addressed by Kelo (bad decision in my opinion, btw). The contractual obligations contained within the lease agreements no doubt stipulate conditions upon, and in regard to, any third party hoping to assume the lease.


61 posted on 03/10/2006 3:40:48 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: yoe

"Schumer, Clinton and King need to hear this; the LSM are not the only unintended consequences this is going to create"

I assume you don't mean Bill Clinton here, because he was paid by the UAE to lobby in favor of the deal.


62 posted on 03/10/2006 3:42:38 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

I never heard anyone say there were no American Companies that could handle the operations. There were none that bid. They do not have the capitol. If they think they are going to pay less than Dubai did they are wrong. Another important factor was that Dubai was going to invest a lot of Capitol in many improvements making their terminals lean and mean, and many times more efficient and the Freaking Unions knew this would cost them jobs just like The Bar Code did. They went on strike for bar codes that saved weeks of Time and lots of money. The entire bottom line is Unions,Democrats,Corruption,mafia,payoffs, and Worthless weenie Pubbies that are afraid of their own shadow. Mark Foley may not be re-elected and he is my Congressman. There are huge numbers of People in my County that Supported him through thick and thin, and worked really hard to get his pompass a$$ elected, but that is past tense. He has lost a lot of support, and he has Conservative Dem competition this time. Without the Conservative Pubbies, he is toast. You may re-think being a Dem again, or call up Pat Buchanan and see what he is doing since he destroyed the reform party. Quite frankly I do not recognize your posts, as being the same person that came from the dems a couple of years ago. I am beginning to think it was an act, I hope not but it would not surprise me. God give you the strength to figure out what you want to really be.


63 posted on 03/10/2006 3:57:25 PM PST by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

"Martin O'Neil, former chairman of the trade and industry select committee, said yesterday that he was concerned that the Singaporean group, PSA, and its strategic partners could gain control of more than 90% of Britain's deep-sea container docks."

Oh well, I guess they have white trash xenophobes in the UK as well. /sarcasm.


64 posted on 03/10/2006 3:57:59 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: samantha

"He has lost a lot of support"

You could easily make this statement about another, far more prominent Republican, but he lost his support for being in favor of the deal, the public relations aspect of which was beyond ham-handed, going straight into some sort of strange farce, that could not have alienated more people if it had been designed for that express purpose.


65 posted on 03/10/2006 4:05:28 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

Whoever has the funding themselves or a credit line of $7 billion is welcome to ante up.


66 posted on 03/10/2006 4:06:57 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother
They can't afford to pay LSM doctor's wages.

Aren't the wages the same for them as a foreign company? Why would an American company profit less? I don't understand.

67 posted on 03/10/2006 4:10:29 PM PST by World'sGoneInsane (LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN, LET NO ONE FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Whoever has the funding themselves or a credit line of $7 billion is welcome to ante up."

There was far more to the DP World buyout of P & O than just the terminal leases held by the former P & O in the United States, so the number will be substantially less that the $6.8 billion proffered for the whole ball of wax. There could well be more than one buyer, looking at the different locations.
68 posted on 03/10/2006 4:10:51 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane

"I don't understand."

That's what muddying the waters is usually intended to accomplish.


69 posted on 03/10/2006 4:11:47 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane
The LSM has to negotiate with the take over company so they were probably going to have to take a cut in pay and benefits or find work elsewhere. The negotiation is a part of the LSM's contracts that guaranteed them the first rights to a job with a new company.
70 posted on 03/10/2006 4:15:06 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I expect each terminal to have a different operator when the dust settles, and I expect Dubai to get a substantial cash settlement from the Federal money vault.


71 posted on 03/10/2006 4:16:49 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
That's what muddying the waters is usually intended to accomplish.

So you muddied the waters and accomplished not answering my question? argh

72 posted on 03/10/2006 4:18:05 PM PST by World'sGoneInsane (LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN, LET NO ONE FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

"I expect Dubai to get a substantial cash settlement from the Federal money vault."

It wouldn't be the first time, and likely won't be the last.


73 posted on 03/10/2006 4:18:54 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane

"So you muddied the waters and accomplished not answering my question? argh"

LOL.


74 posted on 03/10/2006 4:20:56 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

There are apparently 7 terminal contracts and 22 contracts of all kinds, plus there were some other terminal contracts in the works. I don't know what one terminal contract would require up front, but $ 1 billion seems excessive.


75 posted on 03/10/2006 4:24:25 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

"I don't know what one terminal contract would require up front, but $ 1 billion seems excessive."

Somebody posted $700,000.00 on one of the threads, but I don't know of any source for that, so the number is a little suspect, just speculation.


76 posted on 03/10/2006 4:26:52 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: samantha
Bush has been a let down. He continues to call islam the ROP when we know damn well they are not. He leaves our borders wide open. We have more than 11 million illegals here and according to Bush, they are just doing the jobs Americans won't do. He wants to present the lawbreakers of our immigration policy amnesty. He calls the minute men, vigilantes but, they're doing the job he's supposed to be doing...protecting our borders.

He has idiots around him that when they saw UAE attached to a port deal, red lights should have gone off in their heads. What does he say and do? He didn't know about it till it was on his desk. And when we opposed the sale, what does he do? Threatens to pick up the unused veto pen for the first time. Remember 9-11? I do, and so do many Americans.

You think Bush will be the last...(I was going to call him conservative but, I don't think he is)conservative president? He ain't, but he's made his agenda clear. I think now since he can't be reelected, we're seeing what he really supports. Globalization, one worlder, what ever word makes you more comfortable. I voted for Bush, I don't pray to him. He has allowed the dims...the dims, to get ahead of the conservatives on security. I never would have believed it in a million years.

Whether or not you recognize my post is of no concern to me. He's hurting the entire party. Elections are coming up and have you read his last opinion about the republicans running again? I hope it was satire because if it's not he has a payback streak to those who are running for reelection. You want to bury your head in the sand and not see how all these things together are not taking their toll on the party, be my guest. I'm worried about which republican will run of president in '08. We better get ourselves together and pull together a plan before it's too late.

77 posted on 03/10/2006 4:28:02 PM PST by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

Now, it wouldn't surprise me if the Haji's really try to send something thru a port.


78 posted on 03/10/2006 4:30:10 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

"Now, it wouldn't surprise me if the Haji's really try to send something thru a port."

We've all certainly drawn enough attention in that direction, haven't we?


79 posted on 03/10/2006 4:31:26 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother
The negotiation is a part of the LSM's contracts that guaranteed them the first rights to a job with a new company.

Okay. So I don't see how this would be more or less an advantage for a foreign or U.S. company. At this point, it actually may be an advantage for an American company. If Eller is already in the business, they must know what they are getting into. I would like to think that American companies can succeed as do the foreign countries that are there.

80 posted on 03/10/2006 4:32:24 PM PST by World'sGoneInsane (LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN, LET NO ONE FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson