Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MissouriConservative

sure, the coast guard does what you say - but with only 5-7% of the cargo inspected, there is an implicit security component that is a de-facto consequence of them running the facility. the security concerns were always "backdoor", its not like we expect the Emir to walk into a DPW board meeting and say "when are we shipping the dirty bomb into NY harbor". it was always a fear that the company could be infiltrated on the UAE side, perhaps setting up a conduit with jihadis in the US, setup as a subcontractor at one of the port facilities.

Schumers wife is the NYC DOT commissioner.

this deal was a mess from the moment it was revealed, at every level. you cannot have the president out there - talking about security every single day, asking for support for things like the Patriot Act, sensitizing americans to security concerns domestically, searching grandma at airport check-in - you cannot do all these things, and then turn over some port operations to a state owned Arab company and say "its no big deal, trust us". no way you can make that sale.


207 posted on 03/11/2006 7:28:50 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview
With all that being said:

Should the US block container ships from entering US ports which came from the ports of Germersheim in Germany, Constanta in Romania, Puerto Cabello in Venezuela, Puerto Caucedo in the Dominican Republic, Jeddah in Saudi Arabia, Cochin and Visakha Patnam in India, Djibouti in Djibouti, Adelaide in Australia, Yantian, Shanghai Ji Fa and Tiajin in China and three ports from Hong Kong?
209 posted on 03/11/2006 7:38:40 PM PST by jf55510
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview

As you say, if only 5 to 7 percent of the cargo is inspected, what prevented terrorists getting into the ports before now? If I remember correctly, the idiot shoe bomber was British, the same country that P&O is from. Home grown British terrorists destroyed a tube, what prevented British grown terrorists from using the containers unloaded by P&O? A communist Chinese company, hence it is state owned, runs terminals in the port of Los Angeles. What is to prevent them from doing a dirty deed should the temp heat up over Taiwan?

My point is, if security is a problem, it is the problem of the United States to fix through the Coast Guard and US Customs, not to run around like chickens with our heads cut off screaming the sky is falling.

"it was always a fear that the company could be infiltrated on the UAE side, perhaps setting up a conduit with jihadis in the US, setup as a subcontractor at one of the port facilities."

What is to prevent "jihadis" from infiltrating their armed forces and back stabbing us in Afghanistan? Or destroying our naval vessels when they are being serviced in UAE ports? If you live like this then the "jihadis" win because you're chasing shadows.


222 posted on 03/11/2006 8:25:20 PM PST by MissouriConservative (People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid - Kierkegaard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson