I did. When I clicked on the link for "Issues" - this is what I got (3 little blurbs)
:"My first priority in the U.S. Senate is keeping Virginia a safe place to live, work, learn and raise a family. I will continue to work to honor our law enforcement and give them the tools they need to keep our communities safe."
Providing the Tools to Succeed "Our positive, constructive agenda for our children will raise the standards for our schools and hold them accountable. Our children deserve the best education to succeed."
Fighting for Virginia's Taxpayers "Virginia's families and workers pay enough in taxes each year. Cutting taxes across the board creates an atmosphere of innovation and opportunity for all Americans."
Allen wants to keep Virginia safe
provide tools for success
lower taxes.
There isn't much detail there.
Now check out Condi2008.com and click on CondiNews I&II - there are dozens and dozens of articles she has written and speeches she has given. Her views are clearly spelled out.
Now, I have nothing against Allen, in fact I know very little about him.
I'm merely trying to point out the double standard of "We don't know anything about Condi's views" - when her views are there for the reading, yet these same people never say that about any other possible candidate.
I thought that type of behaviour was restricted to liberals. Evidentally not.
However, you must realize that the Condi2008 website WAS NOT DONE by her. Allen's senate website is stating his views of what he plans to d in terms of representing Virginia. The other sites give a very clear indication of Allen's voting record, this does tell you about him.
I have nothing against Condi Rice, but I would not support her in the primaries (though I would vote for her if she was the nominee). Her speeches are great, but they deal primarily with foreign policy issues. The big problem Condi has is that she is pro-abortion, I just don't see the GOP going for that.