Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Port Deal Collapse Sends Bad Message
Associated Press ^ | March 10, 2006 | LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 03/10/2006 8:26:48 AM PST by indcons

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341 next last
To: zook
"DP World will transfer fully the U.S. operations ... to a United States entity," H. Edward Bilkey, the company's top executive, said in the statement. It was unclear which American business might get the port operations."

They are not selling these leases to an domestic American corporation. They will set up an American holding company and *transfer* these operations to that holding company. At the end of the day DPW will ultimately be in control of these terminals.

161 posted on 03/10/2006 9:46:23 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

America's word and the WOT lost. Get used to it.


162 posted on 03/10/2006 9:46:37 AM PST by prairiebreeze (The Old Media: today's carnival barkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Thanks...The most refreshing post of the entire thread.


163 posted on 03/10/2006 9:46:38 AM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot
And why in the hell didn't President Bush call a press conference to make these statements BEFORE it was too late?

Uhhh......he was scheduled to make this talk and IF CONGRESS would have KEPT IT's word and used the 45 days to investigate the DPW deal, he would have......SEVERAL TIMES!!!

Don't you find it strange that Schmucky et al, and the cowardly GOP, DID NOTHING BUT CRITICIZE the POTUS for "RUSHING" into this deal with NO INVESTIGATION, yet when GIVEN 45 days to EDUCATE THEMSELVES, they opted to act in a visceral manner?

164 posted on 03/10/2006 9:46:45 AM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

This was not a security business. It was operation of a port terminal.


165 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:01 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

Bill Clinton helped Dubai on ports deal

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1588266/posts
Financial Times (FT.com) ^ | March 1 2006 23:50 | Stephanie Kirchgaessner

Bill Clinton, former US president, advised top officials from Dubai two weeks ago
on how to address growing US concerns over the acquisition of five US container terminals by DP World.
It came even as his wife, Senator Hillary Clinton, was leading efforts to derail the deal.


166 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:17 AM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (It's ALWAYS a great day to be a Conservative Independent Voter AND a Viet Nam Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: bigeasy_70118
That's why it pays to think for yourself and not drink the Kool-Aid.

Well if you are not drinking from someone's tit why accuse others of the same ?

It's childish and insulting.

167 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:48 AM PST by Earthdweller ("West to Islam" Cake. Butter your liberals, slowly cook France, stir in Europe then watch it rise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
Don't you find it strange that Schmucky et al, and the cowardly GOP, DID NOTHING BUT CRITICIZE the POTUS for "RUSHING" into this deal with NO INVESTIGATION, yet when GIVEN 45 days to EDUCATE THEMSELVES, they opted to act in a visceral manner?

Please. You ask too much of emotional, knee-jerking Bush-bashers.

168 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:50 AM PST by prairiebreeze (The Old Media: today's carnival barkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
I don't think you read the Presidents words, but then again gut instinct and visceral reaction is what MOVED this entire fiasco, not contemplative thought and investigation.

Actually, I think parsing words, making self justifying rationalizations and defending the indefensible escalated this fiasco.

169 posted on 03/10/2006 9:48:55 AM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Details such as those wouldn't concern any reasonable person when viewed in the context of proper vetting

I wonder if some more concern might begin if more news like this that was in the article comes out.

The Bush administration also announced Friday that free trade talks with the United Arab Emirates were being postponed.

The talks, which were supposed to begin Monday, were postponed because both sides need more time to prepare, according to an announcement from the office of U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman (news, bio, voting record). USTR spokeswoman Neena Moorjani refused to say whether the postponement was related to the controversy over the port operations.

170 posted on 03/10/2006 9:49:19 AM PST by imaketypos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
Why is it necessary to officially recognize Israel? They support the notion that Israel has a right to exist.

I believe that they have a policy of religious toleration which is far more lenient than most Middle Eastern countries.

171 posted on 03/10/2006 9:51:09 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Israel supported this deal. Horrors!


172 posted on 03/10/2006 9:52:05 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Coop

The President didn't try to sell the American people on the deal. He only issued a veto threat to congress. There was no leadership. Hopefully he's learned from this and realize he no longer has a blank check from the GOP in congress nor a large portion of the GOP base. But the President is a grown-up and he'll get over it.


173 posted on 03/10/2006 9:53:25 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
Well if you are not drinking from someone's tit why accuse others of the same ? It's childish and insulting.

I never thought I would see the verbal embodiement of the pot calling the kettle black. You accuse me of being a Schumer groupie, as if I agree with him on everything and then tell me I am a childish and insulting? Show me one post on this forum where you disagree with Bush on something.

174 posted on 03/10/2006 9:53:27 AM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Hannity decries the secretive nature of the CFIUS process and the lack of Congressional oversight. But he overlooks the fact that Congress made this a secretive process.


175 posted on 03/10/2006 9:54:25 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver

That's what some people on the Talking Heads shows on cable were indicating (last night)


176 posted on 03/10/2006 9:55:53 AM PST by indcons (The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Maybe. But the White House fumbled the ports deal badly. GOP members in Congress are claiming they did not have a clue until they woke up and read the morning papers. GWB needs to wake up and smell the coffee. About 67% of Americans want border security improved! Ports are the water entry to the U.S. In the meantime, our land borders stand wide open for illegal immigrants and terrorists disguised as Mexicans. Get a grip on reality! Lock down the F&^*&@# borders now!
177 posted on 03/10/2006 9:55:59 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

condescend, much?


178 posted on 03/10/2006 9:57:21 AM PST by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter

I traveled to Florida for a week to get him re-elected yet am told I voted for Kerry and are a DU'er. Go Figure.


179 posted on 03/10/2006 9:58:51 AM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: sully777

Please see my # 171.


180 posted on 03/10/2006 9:59:33 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson