Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Permitting Towns to set own rates for Dog licenses
New Jersey State Legislature ^ | January 2006 | LORETTA WEINBERG

Posted on 03/10/2006 6:16:37 AM PST by ZULU

SENATE, No. 695 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE

PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2006 SESSION

Sponsored by: Senator LORETTA WEINBERG District 37 (Bergen)

SYNOPSIS Permits each municipality to set amount of dog license fee.

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel

AN ACT concerning municipal dog license fees and amending P.L.1941, c.151.

BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

1. Section 12 of P.L.1941, c.151 (C.4:19-15.12) is amended to read as follows: 12. a. The governing body of each municipality may, by ordinance, fix the sum to be paid annually for a dog license and each renewal thereof, as required by section 3 of this act, which sum shall be not less than $1.50 [nor more than $7.00]; provided however, that the governing body may by ordinance, provide for a reduction or waiver of the sum to be paid by an owner who presents a certificate signed by a licensed veterinarian stating that the dog has been spayed or neutered. In the absence of any local ordinance, the fee for all dog licenses shall be $1.50. b. The governing body of each municipality, may, by ordinance, fix the sum to be paid for a 3-year dog license and each renewal thereof, which sum shall be not more than 3 times the sum charged for an annual license under subsection a. of this section. In the absence of such a local ordinance, the license fee for a 3-year dog license shall be $4.50. The Department of Health shall promulgate appropriate regulations concerning veterinarians' certificates for rabies inoculations of dogs for 3-year periods in connection with licenses issued under this subsection. (cf: P.L.1978, c.168, s.1)

2. This act shall take effect immediately, and shall apply to all dog licenses issued after the effective date of this act.

STATEMENT

This bill removes the statutory maximum amount that can be charged by a municipality to a dog owner for a dog license and allows the municipality to set its own fee. Under current law, the maximum annual fee is $7.00. Smaller municipalities, with fewer dogs to license, have complained that the $7.00 maximum annual fee does not cover the cost of the statutorily-required animal control responsibilities in those municipalities, including the cost of an annual free rabies clinic, an animal control officer and a pound facility to house stray animals for the required 7-day period. The failure of the dog license fee to cover these costs means the affected municipalities must use other municipal revenue to provide the required services.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: dogs; germanshepherds; huskies; labradorretrievers; pitbulls
Another aggravating law from the think-tank of wacky laws, introduced by a far left-wing liberal New Jersey Senator (Democrat of course). It appears Ms. Weinberg is done flaying the dead horse of gun control, and has graduated to another target.

Currently the state sets a maximum for dog licenses. This bill would allow local towns to plague its dog-owning residents with special increases. The applicability of this to those breeds particularly repungnant to liberals should be obvious. It would allow towns to set escalating fees based on dog breed, should they so choose.

In the event you wish to express your assessment of Ms. Weinberg's legislative skills, her phone number is 201-928-0100, FAX is 201-928-0406. E-Mail is aswweinberg@njleg.org.

The bill was released by a Senate Committee for a floor vote and then goes to the Assembly, and finally to the Governor, his Eminence Jon Corzine for signature. Being a multi-millionaire and liberal control freak, I doubt if he sees any problem in it.

1 posted on 03/10/2006 6:16:41 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ZULU
the $7.00 maximum annual fee does not cover the cost of the statutorily-required animal control responsibilities

There's the zinger.

2 posted on 03/10/2006 6:21:43 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Then the State should raise the uniform rate.

Leaving it in the hands of the individual towns - 527 of them - would allow them to use it as real revenue source and set a sliding scale for dogs, based on breeds.

Weinberg is a notorious left-wing, gun control nut. Now is out to control a new menace - dogs.

Nest time around she'll go after toenail clippers.

And THAT is the "zinger".


3 posted on 03/10/2006 6:31:14 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson