I think you are confusing flood sediments from a river, where there would obviously be current effects, with oceanic flooding, which would be much more like slow deposits. And as I pointed out, the evolutionist account also requires large seas spread over vast areas now 5000 ft. plus in evlevation to account for sedementary rock formation, so I fail to see how evolutionary theories of flooding upon the face of the earth really differ from the Genesis account other than in the timeframe.
I'm really not interested in debating you. You asked where all the record of flooing is and I said where to look.
The answers are in the Bible. If you don't want to believe the Bible, I'm certainly not going to convince you, and everywhere you look you will find reasons to doubt.
Your choice. Enjoy your secularist atheist alliance with Karl Marx and Co.
See 258. You don't know what you are talking about.
I think you are confusing flood sediments from a river, where there would obviously be current effects, with oceanic flooding, which would be much more like slow deposits.
(Took that out of order, I know.) River floodplains are made of lots of little flood layers and you can tell it wasn't all one big flood. While I'm not familiar with "oceanic flooding," I have never seen a credible account of how it produces the geologic column.
I'm really not interested in debating you.
You're not interested in addressing the flood predictions versus reality problem. That doesn't give us much to discuss.
The answers are in the Bible.
I don't see it as that kind of a book.
Enjoy your secularist atheist alliance with Karl Marx and Co.
"Stroll around the grounds until you feel at home."