The London Telegraph this morning reported portions of the Washington Post article which claims "The American Justice Department investigators have unearthed evidence that China funneled money to the Democratic Party during President Clinton's re-election campaign" and noted "The discovery that communist diplomats may have actively helped the Democrats significantly widens the campaign finance scandal which has blown up in Mr. Clinton's face since his triumph in November.
excerpt
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/china.html
According to the New York Times, Clinton removed $2 billion in trade with China from national security scrutiny. Among the results: 77 supercomputers capable of 13 billion calculations per second that could scramble and unscramble secret data and design nuclear weapons. These were purchased by the Chinese without a peep stateside. At least some of them would be used by the Chinese military.
excerpt
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/2/21/181251.shtml
I will be doing several separate threads on clinton's 'sermon' at Riverside Church. I would have been stunned when I first heard it in 2004, in real time, That is to say, I would have been stunned had the speaker been anyone other than clinton or the wife. (Note the parallels with miss hillary's Martin-Luther-King-Day 'plantation' demagoguery.) As a matter of fact, note the plagiarism. |
Politics and political involvement dictated by faith is not the exclusive province of the right wing. 'All of Us See Through the Glass Darkly' |
The Telegraph in effect has said out loud what many American journalists must be thinking: If the Washington Post allegations turn out to be true, a sitting President of the United States of America may have committed treason. Increasingly, it appears, America's security and trade interests were sacrificed for financial contributions to his re-election. Aldrich Ames, a CIA official who spied for the Soviets for nine years was arrested in February, 1994. In his mind, what he did in undermining American security, was not treason.... Why did Ames turn on his own country? Simple. It was for the money.... Compared with the money which has already surfaced in the Clinton scandals, Aldrich Ames was a bit player. Millions flowed into the Clinton re-election coffers in a few months time. What did Clinton give in return? With the stroke of a pen, as President, he halted the opening of an environment friendly low-sulfur coal mine in Utah, worth billions of dollars, effectively eliminating any competition for Lippo's near world-wide monopoly of low-sulfur coal which is in great demand by utility companies worldwide. And, best of all, he could claim he was HELPING the environment! The fact that his sudden action cost to the State of Utah's educational system alone over a period of 40 years $62 billion, and halted a nearly $1 trillion operation that would provide thousands ofjobs in America was, apparently, a small price to pay for needed campaign funds supplied by the Indonesian Lippo group. Now, we are hearing, opening up markets for AK 47 rifles and other Chinese weapons could well have been the price for contributions from the Chinese, through the Wang Jun, Charles Yah Lin Trie connection. The Chinese Maoists in the Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement who are still holding hostages in the Japanese Embassy in Peru have new, sophisticated Chinese arms. Is there a connection with Wang Jun? Just how DID the Tupac Amaru, which, the Peruvian authorities thought, had been crushed, rise so quickly and how did they get sophisticated Chinese weaponry? The comparison with Aldrich Ames is a sobering thought. But, then, in a nation where character no longer matters and the moral level of our elected officials is of no apparent concern to the voters, when everything is relative and there are no moral absolutes left, does it matter? HIGH LEVEL TREASON IN CLINTON CHINA SCANDAL |
Also, I sent you a reply FR mail explaining how you can repost your question about Inhofe's speech on Hannity.com. Check your mail this morning please. The key is to make sure you type in that it's the 106th Congress and also to tell readers there that it's page number: S7483-S7486.
(there are specific boxes to check when you go to congressionalrecord.org - and/or - congress.org that will help readers to more easily/quickly -find the correct page for Inhofe's speech of June 23, 1999)
I also included in my FRmail to you that when folks actually go to the Congresional Record to see and read Inhofe's speech, that they will see how Ted Kennedy tried to get time for his side of the isle -to say something/or probably inject various Democrat spin after Senator Inhofe finished the speech. (that attempt by Kennedy btw---failed)
* * *
"The Telegraph in effect has said out loud what many American journalists must be thinking: If the Washington Post allegations turn out to be true, a sitting President of the United States of America may have committed treason. Increasingly, it appears, America's security and trade interests were sacrificed for financial contributions to his re-election."