Replies

No, not $10,000, just $50 for his book. His breakthrough work is based on the Rydberg Equation, fractional possibilities thereof. You've heard of fractals, yes? About the same basic idea here, plus the spectrum of hydrinos has been found in the UV part of the solar spectrum, the same way helium was first discovered. Dr Mills theory predicts those spectral lines to within .05% of actual. Throwing brick bats won't make hydrinos go away. And if you didn't know, Dr Mills' hydrino-compound patent was denied in federal court upon spurious Bohr Radius grounds(big oil/vested interests behind the curtain). If he had gotten his patent, electric batteries with 500 times the energy density of lead acid batteries(5000w-h/#)would now be on the shelf.

Actually I went online and looked at hydrinos.org. On there I found several links which purport to point to mathematical derivations of the principles. There is nothing. There are some things cribbed from other sites to add 'fluff', but other than pretty pictures, there is nothing.

He does include a few pictures which seem to describe the n=1/2 orbital. This is Barbra Streisand. There is no such thing. It is flatly impossible, due to the Planck constant, the electron mass and quantum mechanics. There is no n=1/2 orbital in the free hydrogen atom. You can derive the spectrum for the hydrogen atom in any quantum mechanics text and show it for yourself.

Now, you may say that I am arrogantly dismissing him because he has come up with a new method of doing things that is revolutionary. This is also completely impossible, since I, myself, have revolutionized my own fields of research several times in my own career.

I have found far more efficient ways of inverting the Eikonal equation than existed in the past.

I have found techniques for improving the understanding of plasma chambers (note, ions, electrons and nuclei, hint hint).

I have significantly improved the rate and accuracy at which simulated radar displays can be performed.

Each of these were confusedly understood at first by others, but I had demonstratable results that I could put on the table, along with code and experiments that everyone could examine. They are now all accepted standard practice. Each also has had a significant economic impact.

Now, as far as 'big oil interests' Dr. Mills doesn't know the first thing about protecting his intellectual property, or actually he does, since his I.P. lawyer must have told him. You do it this way:

1) Build the battery FIRST, while notarizing your lab notebooks.

2) Then patent it, while submitting notarized copies of your lab notebooks.

Now the scientific community and 'big oil' have an operating object to cope with and a paper trail that demonstrates that he did it. Mills may now collect his royalties and Nobel Prize.

EVERY scientist who has ever patented knows this. Dr. Mills has not done this, therefore he is a LIAR.

Now that you have demonstrated your ignorance in both basic science and intellectual property law, would you like to show it in any other fields?