To: snarks_when_bored
"The big bang would have created zillions of tiny dark energy stars out of the vacuum," says Chapline, who worked on this idea with Mazur. "Our universe is pervaded by dark energy, with tiny dark energy stars peppered across it." These small dark energy stars would behave just like dark matter particles: their gravity would tug on the matter around them, but they would otherwise be invisible. Aren't tiny black holes supposed to evaporate?
6 posted on
03/09/2006 8:48:40 PM PST by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: Moonman62
"Aren't tiny black holes supposed to evaporate?"
![](http://uplink.space.com/attachments/354289-jesse-jackson-sirius.jpg)
This one hasn't yet.
7 posted on
03/09/2006 8:51:00 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
To: Moonman62
The tiny dark stars aren't black holes (according to Chapline). So the Hawking evaporation process isn't relevant to them.
Maybe.
To: Moonman62
Aren't tiny black holes supposed to evaporate?I though Hawking said black HOES . . .
DOH!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson