Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adamsjas

Plus the ships barely carry enough planes to do more than a small strike while conducting CAP.


33 posted on 03/09/2006 10:22:15 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

Plus the ships barely carry enough planes to do more than a small strike while conducting CAP.<<

So call me an idiot, but aren't we going towards more UAVs and less pilots? Isn't this like building a better catapult, when the other side is pondering explosives?

DK


35 posted on 03/09/2006 11:30:05 PM PST by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: lepton
You are correct for a combination of reasons. It's not just the number of planes, but the setup of the flight deck. With only one or two cats and no angled deck, deck speed will be an issue.

110 flight ops in 24 hours is pretty slow. A low tempo day (hey, lets conduct cyclic flight ops) for a U.S. carrier would be 90+ in twelve hours

The combination of deck space, cats, angled deck, and personnel will determine the effective number of aircraft you can launch on a cycle. It doesn't do you any good to say you have 20 jets on the deck when it takes you an hour to launch them.

37 posted on 03/10/2006 8:08:17 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson