"The discovery that this species did not go extinct, like the discovery of the coelcanth, doesn't actually help or hurt the theory of evolution."
You have got to be kidding! This information (total extinction of a species ll million years ago) is being widely disseminated by evolutionists in public schools. To find that this information is erroneous doesn't affect the theory of evolution??
"You have got to be kidding! This information (total extinction of a species ll million years ago) is being widely disseminated by evolutionists in public schools. To find that this information is erroneous doesn't affect the theory of evolution??"
Are you joking?
First off nothing says any organism must evolve. If there is no reason to evolve then the theory then states that they won't evolve. Also evolution doesn't work by an entire species evolving into a new one, a new one branches off from the old one. So now there are two different species. So its possible that other species evolved from this species, but that has no reason to destroy the old one.
BTW doesn't the very fact that its 10.995 million years older than the earths supposed to be fly in the face of creationism?
It is?