Skip to comments.
The atom bombshell that is splitting opinion (new atomic theory)
Financial Times ^
| March 9 2006
| Robert Matthews
Posted on 03/09/2006 12:18:34 PM PST by saganite
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-244 next last
1
posted on
03/09/2006 12:18:36 PM PST
by
saganite
To: saganite
While many scientists express doubts off the record, the fact remains that no one has published a knock-out argument against Dr Mills’ basic theory (though some claim it is so silly it is not worth a rebuttal).
Instead of arguing about it, prove it or disprove it.
2
posted on
03/09/2006 12:22:09 PM PST
by
PeterPrinciple
(Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: saganite
Here we go again!
Hope it si true this time.
3
posted on
03/09/2006 12:22:39 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: saganite
Fascinating! Thanks for posting this!
4
posted on
03/09/2006 12:23:02 PM PST
by
nikola
To: PeterPrinciple
Instead of arguing about it, prove it or disprove it.
LOL! I'll get right on it.
5
posted on
03/09/2006 12:23:14 PM PST
by
saganite
(The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
To: saganite
The article said -- "What really matters is whether hot hydrogen can be persuaded to give out more energy than it takes in, making it a viable power source."
The only question I have is -- "When can we get rid of oil (and these infernal radical Muslims)?"
Regards,
Star Traveler
To: saganite
"While many scientists express doubts off the record, the fact remains that no one has published a knock-out argument against Dr Mills’ basic theory (though some claim it is so silly it is not worth a rebuttal)." Recalling the same was said for the theory that the earth wasn't flat!
7
posted on
03/09/2006 12:24:24 PM PST
by
patriot_wes
(papal infallibility - a proud tradition since 1869)
To: RadioAstronomer
8
posted on
03/09/2006 12:27:01 PM PST
by
saganite
(The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
To: PeterPrinciple
Instead of arguing about it, prove it or disprove it. True. Dr. Blacklight has been around for years. It's time for him to start producing.
9
posted on
03/09/2006 12:27:17 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: saganite
Dr. Mill must know how Copernicus felt when he came to the conclusion that the Earth REVOLVED AROUND THE SUN!! How utterly ridiculous this theory seemed to be in his time, BUT:
People watched the different movements and changes of the stars and planets in the night sky, from lands as far apart as China and Mesopotamia. A lot of people believed that Earth sat at the center of the universe, and eveyrthing else such as the sun, other planets, and the stars all revolved around it.
An astronomer named Nicolaus Copernicus challenged that idea in about 1543. He soon recognized that Earth orbits around the sun. And about 1608, Italian Astronomer Galileo Galilei, made his first telescope, that scientists had firm evidence that Corpernicus was right. _________________________________________ Ah, that ol'e addage still applies, even after many centuries: The wisdom of man is foolishness unto God.
To: saganite
So which is it: is Dr Mills a crank or a genius? Both. He's a very good huckster.
11
posted on
03/09/2006 12:29:07 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
To: saganite
To paraphrase Jerry McGuire:
SHOW ME THE ERGS!
12
posted on
03/09/2006 12:29:11 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: saganite
The post so nice you did it twice?........
13
posted on
03/09/2006 12:29:33 PM PST
by
Red Badger
(And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
To: saganite
Quantum physics makes me feel so . . . uncertain.
14
posted on
03/09/2006 12:29:34 PM PST
by
colorado tanker
(We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
To: saganite
Clinton's probably on his way to Dubai to tell the UAE folks that now's the time to corner the energy market. Can our guys please, if this pans out, make it a US project? Let's hold feet to the fire on this one...
15
posted on
03/09/2006 12:31:09 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(MSM coverage of Iraq War is like a sports section written by women who hate sports.)
To: VadeRetro
16
posted on
03/09/2006 12:31:10 PM PST
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: PeterPrinciple
17
posted on
03/09/2006 12:31:29 PM PST
by
Jonx6
To: saganite
To: Red Badger
Did I? I don't see it posted twice. Enlighten me please.
19
posted on
03/09/2006 12:32:10 PM PST
by
saganite
(The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
To: colorado tanker
Quantum physics makes me feel so . . . uncertain. Is it the principle of the thing that bothers you?
20
posted on
03/09/2006 12:32:33 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(MSM coverage of Iraq War is like a sports section written by women who hate sports.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-244 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
