Maybe, in eons gone by. But now a rapist's intrusion can be fixed with the morning after pill and doesn't need to wait til the last month. It is an emotional argument way past reality. Incest, however, can be more problematic.. as it could go hidden until it becomes more complicated. Then it should be more left to responsible relatives and certainly not the State. The boggy about genetic damage is certainly in the realm of "wives tales", where, in reality, it takes many generations to produce genetic damage. The baby is a victim not the "problem" to be disposed of.
Look up the threads on the "morning after pill". Many believe that it can cause a very early abortion by causing the fertilized egg to fail to implant in the uterine lining. SD, however, does not count the morning after pill as an abortion for the purpose of their ban.
Well see, that's the problem. Those that oppose surgical abortion oppose the morning after pill with the same fervor. Ask cpforlife.org if you don't believe me. He/she considers the morning after pill an abortion.