Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe
We have secure yards in the MED with trusted allies.

Have you been paying attention to the demographics of those "trusted allies?"

Also, you're assuming that the ship will be allowed to transit Suez (which, incidentally, is a huge risk in and of itself.)

In all likely hood the ship in the yards has lost at least 30 days anyway

"So what if we make it 60 days?"

818 posted on 03/10/2006 1:57:46 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies ]


To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Also, you're assuming that the ship will be allowed to transit Suez (which, incidentally, is a huge risk in and of itself.)

I'm not a supporter of using the Suez for war ships. I'd rather see sufficient assets both east and west coast to prevent it. Actually I think we need a carrier capable ship builder on the west coast. We went from having four such yards to one nationwide. Granted NNSBDD has built the majority of them. BTW when Iran took the hostages in 79 we didn't even use the ditch then and at least one Carrier the JFK was sent from the east coast.

But that being said we started using it again for that purpose in 1981. The USS AMERICA CV-66 was the first carrier to transit the canal since the 1960's

824 posted on 03/10/2006 2:24:45 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson