To: bayourant
I hope the anti port anti Bush Freepers are happy. Not yet but I will be when U.S. Navy ships are no longer moored to the piers there.
74 posted on
03/09/2006 10:56:11 AM PST by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: cva66snipe
Not yet but I will be when U.S. Navy ships are no longer moored to the piers there.You have NO idea what you're talking about. If the Navy can't resupply there, where will they do it? Do you understand the military significance of supply lines? How about the military significance of the Straits of Hormuz?
109 posted on
03/09/2006 11:01:50 AM PST by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: cva66snipe
Not yet but I will be when U.S. Navy ships are no longer moored to the piers there. Didn't see a sarcasm tag so I'd like to ask ... where would you prefer docking them instead?
213 posted on
03/09/2006 11:29:51 AM PST by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: cva66snipe
Not yet but I will be when U.S. Navy ships are no longer moored to the piers there LOL! so where do you suggest they moor?
To: bayourant
Is it possible, in your opinion, to disagree W and not be anti-Bush? Just wondering,,,
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson