Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski
You have NO idea what you're talking about. If the Navy can't resupply there, where will they do it? Do you understand the military significance of supply lines? How about the military significance of the Straits of Hormuz?

A U.S.N.S. supply ship docking to take on supplies is one thing. A U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier MOORING PIER SIDE for Port of Call or supplies is quite another. I understand how to replenish and such terms as VERT-REP that were traditionally done. Now I ask you if you understand this. The USS COLE IF it was in company of fleet instead of two days away could have taken fuel from a U.S.N.S. oiler OR another ship in company. BUT someone either in the State Department or Pentagon wasn't thinking like a military planner they were thinking like a Diplomat which is the entire problem right now in the Middle East. Understand? I sure do.

610 posted on 03/09/2006 3:15:00 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: cva66snipe

You make a fundamental mistake when you equate port safety of Yemen with UAE.

Cole was taking supplies portside because that's how the Clinton administration wanted it. That came from the Oval, not the Pentagon. It was an effort to have a presence in port, to be some kind of good will gesture...suicidally foolish.


620 posted on 03/09/2006 3:34:55 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson