To: Frank_Discussion
They are an ally!
so we should just hand over the ports?
"The notion of total national security is now a myth. Total security and total defense in the age of globalization are not attainable. The real issue is: with how much insecurity can America live while promoting its interests in an increasingly interactive, interdependent world?"--Zbigniew Brzezinski
432 posted on
03/09/2006 10:05:28 AM PST by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
We are not handing them the ports! It is a business deal to manage one aspect of port operations via a external company. We can still kick them out if they eff around, since we own the land. They've engaged in a legal and vetted business transaction, and they've been an ally. They are paying a lot of good money for this access, so I don't think "giving" is at all the right term.
448 posted on
03/09/2006 10:09:50 AM PST by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: hedgetrimmer
so we should just hand over the ports? Of course not. But NO ONE IS PROPOSING THAT.
522 posted on
03/09/2006 10:22:14 AM PST by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson