Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MikefromOhio

A Political Surrender To Protectionism? - By Larry Kudlow

So the White House arranged a sale of Dubai Ports World that will transfer its port operations to a yet-to-be-named U.S. entity. We don't even know if it is a private American company or a government agency of some sort.

Here's something Sen. Schumer can fume about -- one of the very few private American firms capable of running a bunch of port terminals is HALLIBURTON. That's right, Halliburton. Remember them? Every Democrats' favorite.

But the big question is whether foreign investors are being repelled by neo-protectionist American politicians who are using phony national security reasons to advance an anti-trade, anti-investment, xenophobic agenda. This is a point that Steve Moore over at the WSJ is putting forth and it is vitally important. Do we really want to tell foreign capital not to come here? Do we want it in China? Russia? Brazil?

An international think tank estimates that U.S. jobs from foreign direct investment average over $60,000 per job; 34 percent more than U.S. capitalized jobs.

Today's stock market opened up, but at precisely 2:00 p.m. EST when the Dubai Ports World sale was announced, stocks turned tail and closed down 33 points on the day. What does that tell you?

Do we really want to send a message to world investors that we don't want their capital? Do we really want a political surrender to protectionism? Do we really want to emulate the political economy of Smoot Hawley of the 1930s? I don't think so.

- Larry Kudlow, Host of CNBC's Kudlow & Co.


1,777 posted on 03/09/2006 7:19:11 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1764 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
"Do we really want to send a message to world investors that we don't want their capital? Do we really want a political surrender to protectionism? Do we really want to emulate the political economy of Smoot Hawley of the 1930s? I don't think so."

I was visiting with friends this afternoon, and we were watching Kudlow on CNBC, (while arguing about the deal). Kudlow was fabulous. And one of the very few pundits who "gets" this whole deal. I'm going to try to watch him more often.

1,814 posted on 03/09/2006 7:51:39 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1777 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Here's something Sen. Schumer can fume about -- one of the very few private American firms capable of running a bunch of port terminals is HALLIBURTON.

I hope nobody is counting on upsetting Chuckie Schmucky's apple cart. When asked about Halliburton taking this deal he said, and I quote; "I have no problem with that." He's learned some triangulation of his own. The Dems have duped the GOP into committing sepaku.

1,823 posted on 03/09/2006 7:56:56 PM PST by TigersEye (Everywhere I look all I see are my own desires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1777 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson