So, now that I have asked you to back up your first claim, you're changing the claim, do I have that right?
I do recall you saying that the UAE had few terror ties, etc...
Again, I never said any such thing.
And whatever this link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1584285/posts is, I'm not on that thread, so I have no idea why you posted it.
OH YEAH! I remember the other one... that Bush had no role in this port deal and didn't know of it. Yah. Now, I couldn't find proof outright proof, but COME ON. I don't have the links here at work, but I have gathered enough evidence on my own to think that he *was* involved. And knew. That was the big one. How could he *not* know?
Good lord; that is W E A K. Which is it, you have proof (which is what you said in the beginning) or you don't.
BTW, if you *think* one way and I *think* another, that doesn't make ME wrong, you know? You could be the one who is wrong, right?
right