Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abathar

Oh, not this shi'ite again.


2 posted on 03/09/2006 5:53:17 AM PST by Tax-chick (Death is perishable. Faith is eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

Yep, just too stupid to pass up I guess...


3 posted on 03/09/2006 5:54:13 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick; All
This move appears to force the court to only look at equality under the law - not whether or not there should be abortion. If successful, it will probably weaken support for abortion among women. I have to conclude those on this board who oppose it are either pro-abortion or really bad chess players. If the court must rule that whatever solution the government allows must be adjudicated between sperm donor and egg donor because of the equal protection clause that is a step toward seriously reducing support for abortion. You can't seem to think more than three moves ahead - I won't put my bishop there I'll lose it.

No Sarc tag.

178 posted on 03/09/2006 11:52:46 AM PST by MrEdd (I would have gotten away with it too - if it weren't for those meddling kids and their stupid dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson