Posted on 03/08/2006 10:13:29 AM PST by NYer
True, but damming up the Nile would have been one hell of a challenge. And like many Commandments, this one is sufficiently blanket as to cover a lot of irrelevant turf... sould like you'd get your butt in a sling for damming up a single small ditch.
Perhaps the commandment-writer saw all the Pyramids going up and decided that one of these days some pharoh would get it into his head to build a pyramid in the middle of the Nile, and came up with this commandment to head him off at the pass.
More likely the prohibition on dams had to do with impeding the natural courses of waters which God (or the gods) intended to flow as they do.
The same issue arose in Catholicism, and showed a distinct difference between the French and the Spanish variants thereof. The French were great canal builders, linking the entire country by a system of canals that effectively gave France the waterway equivalent of a railroad by the mid-1600s. This was of enormous commercial benefit to the French, and was an infrastructural reason that France surged to such economic power under Louis XIII and XIV. Cardinal Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarin, as Prime Ministers, both invested heavily in the canal system and saw it much as Eisenhower saw the US Interstate Highway System.
Meanwhile, in Spain, the same concept of canals to link the river systems and, incidentally, irrigate the fertile but dry bottomlands was seriously considered. But it was opposed by various Spanish clergy, on mystical bases having to do with altering God's intent, etc.
The same sort of concept appears in the Magna Carta, which among other things orders the removal of all weirs and the building of no new weirs along various rivers.
The Spanish (and Norman-French rulers of England) were not thinking economically but religiously (or rather, superstitiously) when they opposed the construction of the canals. By contrast the French, just as Catholic as the Spaniards, had two Cardinals linking every medium sized village by a vast canal system which still operates today.
My guess is that the Egyptians were not thinking economically but superstitiously, just like the Spanish in the more recent example.
Commandments paint with broad brushes. They rarely draw fine lines between, say, damming up the Nile and damming up an irrigation ditch.
I'm not familiar with Egyptian religious practices, but I imagine, just as with the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages, there was probably a way to make donations to the appropriate god in order to receive forgiveness for smaller sins.
> The Spanish (and Norman-French rulers of England) were not thinking economically but religiously (or rather, superstitiously) when they opposed the construction of the canals.
Huh. So... what's ancient Egyptian for "Greenpeace?"
"Huh. So... what's ancient Egyptian for 'Greenpeace?'"
That would depend.
In Egypt proper, probably some hieroglyphic showing a bunch of smiling fish beneath a boat with figures of smiling-faced men in it.
The Egyptians in France might have painted the same hieroglyphic with the fish darting away, a hole torn in the side of the boat, and looks of fear and alarm on the faces of the human stick figures.
Just a guess.
Very good point.
"This is a perplexing position you've taken. It leads me to wonder what criteria you use to differentiate concepts from one another, if not by name, time of origin, location of origin, appearance, disposition, or history."
The Christian criteria are "Divine Revelation". It does require an aspect of proof. For example a madman raving that that he has seen the face of God and this is what he told me to tell you guys is not sufficient. It requires a bit more than one person saying "this is true".
Since events in the ancient pass are so often dismissed just because they did not happen now is a common reaction allow me to give you a good and fairly modern event that the Roman Catholic Church has ruled as valid? It will give you an example of the sort of Criteria you are asking about. (I am assuming you are sincere in this)
In 1917 in Portugal (Fatima to be specific) there were 3 children (the oldest about the age of 10) started seeing the Blessed Mother. Crowd started to follow the children to the site of these visions on the days they were expected. Each time the crowds got larger and many of the crowd saw unusual things. It ended with a very impressive vision seen by the 70,000 observes involving the dancing of the sun. It had rained all night and into the morning and everyone there was sopping wet when it all started. In a few moments the ground was made dry and the people's wet clothing was dried. This one item alone is not explainable in science and everyone surviving the process to dry everything out in the short time that it occurred. (A process to do this would result in the death of those present if you are only willing to see such an event as a natural/worldly as explained by science)
This was witnessed my faithful Catholics of course but also a large number of disbelievers. Portugal at the time was being ruled by an anti-Catholic and anti-Christian government. Many there were atheist and other assorted types. The children had many predictions on world events that have come true.
There are a few things to know about the whole thing.
1. The children did not have the education or worldly knowledge to make an educated guess about the future.
2. The children never said a single thing that was against Catholic Theology which may have happened if they were faking.
3. The miracles that occurred were witness by many and many were hostile to the Catholic faith.
4. Science can not explain the entire event.
5. The event has been examined by the appropriate religious authorities who also sought out advice on the matter from science and those who where there and not just Catholics.
This is much more on this event should you wish to see it. There are other examples but I can think of no other religion that looks at such events with real hesitations and has to be convinced through real scholarship even using science to evaluate it.
The criteria are stricter in this one case alone than what often passes for criteria in the modern scientific community today. If you are a regular reader of FR you most likely can think of a few examples of this sort of thing without my help.
For more on the events at Fatima you can find many websites on the subject. Here are just a few:
http://www.angelfire.com/id/bvm/OurLadyofFatima.htm
http://www.fatima.org/
http://www.santuario-fatima.pt/portal/index.php?id=1000
I hope this example answers your question.
There's ONE 25-year old and she weighs 300 pounds! Enjoy!
Hmmm, it's easy to do....both have trees :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.