I was responding to your #61; sometimes I compose my response posts on MS "WordPad", and by the time I was finished, I did not even flag you.
Please see my #77, with apologies (and no wisecracks, I'm sorry for the oversight!).
Thank you for your response, OP.
The notion that I have to put up with some nut defiling the death of my loved one just because of some bizarre superiority of "I can say any damn thing I want anytime I want" over all other rights is simply idiotic.
As you say more appropriately, it is unbiblical and unpropertarian.
I especially enjoyed your changing the "life, liberty, property" formula to its proper order: "Life, property, liberty."
Who can deny that encroachment on the "right of life" renders all other rights moot....you'll not be around to enjoy the others? And who can deny that the "right to own property" must be the basis for freedoms of speech, assembly, security, etc.
I DO NOT have a RIGHT to "assemble" on YOUR property.