Skip to comments.
STILLWELL: Bush and the Ports: The Honeymoon Is Over
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 3/8/6
| Cinnamon Stillwell
Posted on 03/08/2006 7:50:10 AM PST by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: ElPatriota
I think you are pulling my leg.. :)
ok fine, we disagree.
41
posted on
03/08/2006 10:39:32 AM PST
by
ElPatriota
(Let's not forget that we are still friends despite our differences!)
To: Wasanother
That may change and when it does the argument will be present to correlate the two, terrorism and Mexican Border. I guess I can not see the logic in waiting until we are attacked before implementing common sense defensive measures.
42
posted on
03/08/2006 10:43:37 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: ElPatriota
ELp to ELp... :) How did that happen? sorry. I tried responding to someone.
43
posted on
03/08/2006 10:44:39 AM PST
by
ElPatriota
(Let's not forget that we are still friends despite our differences!)
To: ElPatriota
where is the consistency here! Political oportunists will consistantly disregard all but their greedy ploys and to those who are concerned about America, their actions may appear to be dangerously eratic and illogical. They are selling out America.
44
posted on
03/08/2006 10:50:26 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: eskimo
People will drive themselves nuts with all the would have, could have and should haves. Border Security is needed but to kill everything until the one thing is addressed would also not be practical nor would it be anymore security. The whole bureaucracy that you speak of can happen at light speed but history tells us that it won't happen until there is an emergency and it's not all Bush's fault.
45
posted on
03/08/2006 10:52:20 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: eskimo
Would shutting down every gas station in the U.S. be a "common sense defensive measure"?
To: eskimo
No, it was only eight years and six months between the first and second attack on the WTC. Who was in office during that eight years? I alway forget.
47
posted on
03/08/2006 11:02:45 AM PST
by
msg-84
To: Wasanother
Border Security is needed but to kill everything until the one thing is addressed would also not be practical nor would it be anymore security. We hear all kinds of excuses and, to me, they are all BS. No need to kill anything, people living on the borders and volunteers would gladly do the job as they have for centuries.
48
posted on
03/08/2006 11:05:07 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: msg-84
49
posted on
03/08/2006 11:06:55 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: eskimo
If there is enough volunteers to do the job, why is there a problem with the border?
50
posted on
03/08/2006 11:07:27 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: eskimo
Would shutting down every gas station in the U.S. be a "common sense defensive measure"?
To: Wasanother
If there is enough volunteers to do the job, why is there a problem with the border? What presently passes for government does not seem to want the job done.
52
posted on
03/08/2006 11:14:30 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: eskimo
NO, YOU explain what "directs operations" means.....I need to understand what YOU THINK it means, before I can answer.
53
posted on
03/08/2006 11:14:32 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
To: clawrence3
54
posted on
03/08/2006 11:15:11 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: BooksForTheRight.com
55
posted on
03/08/2006 11:16:20 AM PST
by
angcat
To: Wasanother
a law can not be enforced retroactively. Nobody told Clinton about that part. So, it no longer applies, apparently, to tax bills.
56
posted on
03/08/2006 11:16:34 AM PST
by
El Gato
To: ElPatriota
57
posted on
03/08/2006 11:17:23 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: SmithL
If the last six years was a honeymoon for Bush I´d hate to see the marriage.
58
posted on
03/08/2006 11:18:00 AM PST
by
Americanexpat
(A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
To: eskimo
Write your congressman whether Democrat or Republican and you'll get the same,"we're working on it". As for the President,"must go" as the other poster claimed, he doesn't make law and since he's never vetoed anything, nothing concerning the Mexican border has been proposed to him.
59
posted on
03/08/2006 11:21:13 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: goodnesswins
NO, YOU explain what "directs operations" means.....I need to understand what YOU THINK it means, before I can answer. Hint: One word is a verb and the other a noun. Use the traditional English language definitions. That's exactly what I mean. If I must explain something that simple, I'm afraid any explanation would also be, to you, ambiguous.
60
posted on
03/08/2006 11:24:21 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson