Skip to comments.
STILLWELL: Bush and the Ports: The Honeymoon Is Over
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 3/8/6
| Cinnamon Stillwell
Posted on 03/08/2006 7:50:10 AM PST by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
1
posted on
03/08/2006 7:50:11 AM PST
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
In other words, the Republican Party is dooooooomed.
2
posted on
03/08/2006 7:52:10 AM PST
by
sarasota
To: Cool Guy; CounterCounterCulture; Arkat Kingtroll; bayareablues; pbear8; Jerez2; SunStar; ...
3
posted on
03/08/2006 7:52:35 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: SmithL
There was also an incurable rift for the Patriot Act and the NSA program yet for everyone of these rifts the Republican's have been able to overcome them and pass good alternative agreements. This will be the same process.
4
posted on
03/08/2006 7:57:04 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: SmithL
Cinnamon Stillwell Gotta wonder how she worked her way through journalism school ...
5
posted on
03/08/2006 7:57:20 AM PST
by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: tx_eggman
6
posted on
03/08/2006 8:03:31 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: SmithL
Another. OH How I wish, I wish this were reality. Another example of a Junk Journalist who writes a story based on what she WANTs to believe, not what the reality is.
7
posted on
03/08/2006 8:09:44 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
To: SmithL
The company at hand, Dubai Ports World, is owned by the United Arab Emirates, so not only would we be handing over operations of our ports I see the Port Deal Hysterics in the pay of the Democrat Party sill WILL NOT report the truth. 9 terminals, out of 300, in 6 Ports is NOT "handing over operations of our ports". When they tell you THIS lie in the third week of the story, despite it being nuked since about the 3rd day of the story, you can pretty much plan on everything in the article being distortions, lies and hysteria.
8
posted on
03/08/2006 8:12:52 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
To: SmithL
You have questions, we have answers: Thanks for the link, I'll start paying attention to her.
9
posted on
03/08/2006 8:14:52 AM PST
by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: MNJohnnie
The company at hand, Dubai Ports World, is owned by the United Arab Emirates, so not only would we be handing over operations of our ports I see the Port Deal Hysterics in the pay of the Democrat Party sill WILL NOT report the truth.
What was not true?
10
posted on
03/08/2006 8:22:04 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: SmithL
But as Charles Krauthammer pointed out, all this hand-wringing by Dimmis is posturing hypocrisy. Because if they attempted to search a Middle Eastern dressed in a burnoose, speaking Arabic and acting suspicious in the airport, this leftist b***h would be the first one screaming "RACIST! PROFILING!"
11
posted on
03/08/2006 8:28:51 AM PST
by
Right Cal Gal
(Conservatives know the names of Tookie's VICTIMS!!)
To: SmithL
If I'm recalling correctly, a bill passed in both Chambers of Congress will not become law until it's either signed by the President or 30 days have passed to where the President has neither signed or vetoed the bill and a law can not be enforced retroactively.
12
posted on
03/08/2006 8:29:57 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: SmithL
On top of it all, the original report that only six ports were affected by the deal turned out to be misleading. It is in fact 21 ports that are at stake, which would give the United Arab Emirates control over almost every major shipping terminal on the Eastern Seaboard. For some reason, much of the media continues to report the lower figure. Sniff sniff, just because you manage 1 terminal at a port does NOT mean you control the whole port.
To: eskimo
Let me know if you ever get an answer to that question. Not insults as usual, but an answer.
14
posted on
03/08/2006 8:51:47 AM PST
by
WatchingInAmazement
("Nothing is more expensive than cheap labor," prof. Vernon Briggs, labor economist Cornell Un.)
To: WatchingInAmazement
I will if it isn't just more hysteria.
15
posted on
03/08/2006 8:55:36 AM PST
by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: SmithL
Bush must go.
Spending billions to kill Iraquis won't keep us safe.
Closing the borders will, but Bush is totally and willfully incompetent in this matter.
Bush must go.
16
posted on
03/08/2006 9:02:23 AM PST
by
BooksForTheRight.com
(what have you done today to fight terrorism/leftism (same thing!))
To: eskimo
I'll bite....we are NOT "handing over operation of our ports." There are TERMINALS (landing places for barges/ships) which will have individuals (Americans, union members) working there who will now get a paycheck from a Dubai Company instead of a British Company.
17
posted on
03/08/2006 9:03:50 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
To: BooksForTheRight.com
Have we been attacked on our soil since 911?
18
posted on
03/08/2006 9:04:40 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: eskimo; WatchingInAmazement
You mean other than "handing over operations of our ports", "45-day investigation normally required", "President Bush's claim that he knew nothing about the deal until after it had been approved, which wasn't terribly reassuring", "21 ports that are at stake, which would give the United Arab Emirates control over almost every major shipping terminal on the Eastern Seaboard"?
Read more at sfgate.com
To: BooksForTheRight.com
Bush must go.It sure looks like he'll never be reelected.
20
posted on
03/08/2006 9:11:29 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson